Table 9 Comparison of our independent test with IonSeq
From: Prediction of acid radical ion binding residues by K-nearest neighbors classifier
Ligand | Method | L | Optimal k value | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | Acc (%) | FPR(%) | MCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NO2− | IonSeq | 11 | – | 18.00 | 99.78 | 98.79 | – | 0.2847 |
OUR’S | 13 | 75 | 40.90 | 98.60 | 97.90 | 1.40 | 0.3100 | |
CO32− | IonSeq | 13 | – | 10.62 | 99.82 | 98.58 | – | 0.2127 |
OUR’S | 15 | 115 | 48.40 | 95.00 | 94.40 | 5.00 | 0.2170 | |
SO42− | IonSeq | 11 | – | 13.65 | 99.32 | 97.53 | – | 0.1906 |
OUR’S | 13 | 37 | 43.90 | 86.80 | 85.80 | 13.20 | 0.1160 | |
PO43− | IonSeq | 11 | – | 24.15 | 99.38 | 97.95 | – | 0.3121 |
OUR’S | 13 | 61 | 63.20 | 84.60 | 84.20 | 15.40 | 0.1810 |