Skip to main content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Collagen/β1 integrin interaction is required for embryoid body formation during cardiogenesis from murine induced pluripotent stem cells

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cell Biology201314:5

  • Received: 20 October 2012
  • Accepted: 23 January 2013
  • Published:



The interactions between stem cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) mediated by integrins play important roles in the processes that determine stem cell fate. However, the role of ECM/integrin interaction in the formation of embryoid bodies (EBs) during cardiogenesis from murine induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs) remains unclear.


In the present study, collagen type I and β1 integrin were expressed and upregulated synergistically during the formation of miPSC-derived EBs, with a peak expression at day 3 of differentiation. The blockage of collagen/β1 integrin interaction by β1 integrin blocking antibody resulted in the production of defective EBs that were characterized by decreased size and the absence of a shell-like layer composed of primitive endoderm cells. The quantification of spontaneous beating activity, cardiac-specific gene expression and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) immunostaining showed that the cardiac differentiation of these defective miPSC-derived EBs was lower than that of control EBs.


These findings indicate that collagen/β1 integrin interaction is required for the growth and cardiac differentiation of miPSC-derived EBs and will be helpful in future engineering of the matrix microenvironment within EBs to efficiently direct the cardiac fate of pluripotent stem cells to promote cardiovascular regeneration.


  • Collagen/β1 integrin interaction
  • Embryoid body
  • Cardiac differentiation
  • Induced pluripotent stem cell


Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by unlimited proliferation capacity and multipotency and are one of the most promising stem cell populations for use in cardiovascular regenerative medicine. However, the use of ESCs is hampered by their embryonic origin and by the potential immune rejection of allogeneic cell grafts. These issues may potentially be circumvented by the use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that are reprogrammed from somatic cells by the ectopic expression of 4 transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4) [1, 2]. The use of iPSCs allows the generation of patient-specific cells of any lineage that is not derived from embryos. iPSCs have a differentiation capacity similar to that of ESCs and were shown to be capable of differentiating into functional cardiomyocytes through embryoid body (EB) formation [3, 4]. EB formation has been utilized widely as a trigger of in vitro differentiation in ESCs and iPSCs and is a critical intermediate step in the induction of lineage-specific differentiation [5]. The importance of EB formation is further demonstrated by findings that lineage-specific differentiation programs within EBs closely resemble lineage commitment programs in the developing embryo [6, 7].

Lineage-specific differentiation within EBs is a response to a variety of environmental stimuli, including cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interactions. Recent strategies for engineering EB formation have focused primarily on controlling EB size, extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions and cell-cell adhesion [8]. Processes that determine cell fate are often mediated by the ECM, and such mediation has been studied largely by seeding ESCs or EBs within natural ECM hydrogel materials [9, 10]. Native ECM components such as collagen, fibronectin and laminin direct cell differentiation through integrin-mediated signaling events [11] and through intracellular signaling cascades that ultimately lead to gene expression changes that modulate cell phenotype [12]. ECM/integrin interactions have been shown to influence stem cell differentiation, attachment and proliferation during early embryonic development [9, 13]. However, little is known regarding the role of ECM/integrin interactions in the growth and cardiac lineage commitment of iPSC-derived EBs that closely resemble corresponding processes in the developing embryo. The objective of the present study was to explore the role of collagen/β1 integrin interaction in EB formation from miPSCs and the involvement of such interaction in the differentiation of miPSCs into cardiomyocytes.


Collagen and β1 integrin are expressed synergistically during EB formation

The morphology of the undifferentiated miPSC colonies carrying the GFP transgene targeted to the Oct4 locus closely resembled that of the mESCs growing on either MEFs or gelatin-coated dishes under feeder-free conditions and expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Figure 1A). To induce cardiac differentiation, the miPSCs and mESCs were cultured via the hanging drop method or static suspension to form three-dimensional embryoid bodies (EBs) (Figure 1B). Through both of these culture systems, EBs resembling those derived from mESCs were generated from the miPSCs on day 3 and 5 of differentiation (Figure 2A, B).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Cell culture of mESCs and miPSCs. (A) Morphology of undifferentiated miPSCs and mESCs cultured on MEF feeder layers or gelatin-coated plates. (B) Scheme of EB formation via the hanging drop method and static suspension culture as described in Materials and Methods.

Figure 2
Figure 2

EB formation by mESCs and miPSCs. 3-day and 5-day-old EBs derived from mESCs and miPSCs via the hanging drop method (A) and static suspension culture (B). Insets: fluorescent micrographs of miPSC-derived EBs that expressed Oct4-eGFP. Scale bars = 200 μm.

To explore the role of collagen/integrin interactions in EB formation, the expression of collagen and of its integrin receptors (α1, α2, β1) was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR in undifferentiated mESCs, miPSCs, and EBs. Undifferentiated mESCs and miPSCs expressed Itga1 and Itgb1 (integrin α1, β1), whereas Col1A1, Col1A2, Col3A1 and Itga2 were not expressed (Figure 3A). During EB formation, the expression of Col1A1 and Itgb1 was upregulated and peaked on day 3 of differentiation, then fell to levels equal to those in mESCs and miPSCs on day 5 (Figure 3A). Real-time PCR results confirmed that Col1A1 and Itgb1 were expressed in a temporal pattern with a peak on day 3 during EB formation (Figure 3B, C). The expression of Itga1 (an α subunit of collagen receptor) was not upregulated but reduced on day 5 during EB formation (Figure 3D). Immunostaining of EBs on day 3 demonstrated the expression of collagen type I (Figure 3E). These findings suggest that collagen type I and β1 integrin were expressed temporarily and synergistically during EB formation in mESCs and miPSCs.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Expression patterns of collagen and integrins during EB formation. (A) mRNA expression of collagen (Col1A1, Col1A2, Col3A1) and its integrin receptors (Itga1, Itga2, Itgb1) determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR. (B to D) Real-time PCR analysis of Col1A1, Itga1 and Itgb1, normalized to β-actin, in mESCs, miPSCs, and EBs (days 3 and 5). Experiments were performed in triplicate. *Significant at p < 0.05. (E) Immunostaining of collagen type I in miPSC-derived EBs on day 3. Scale bars = 200 μm.

β1 integrin blocking inhibits the growth and shell formation of miPSC-derived EBs

Because ECM/integrin interactions have been shown to influence stem cell differentiation during early embryonic development [9, 13], we hypothesized that collagen/β1 integrin interaction may play a similar role in EB formation, which closely resembles embryonic development. To test this hypothesis, we administered 100 μM Vc, 300 μM CIS and 10 ng/ml β1 integrin blocking antibody to respectively promote collagen synthesis, inhibit collagen synthesis, and block collagen/β1 integrin interaction prior to EB formation (Figure 4A). Size analysis showed that the mean diameter of the EBs produced in static suspension culture was larger in the Vc group and smaller in the CIS and β1 integrin blocking groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05, Figure 4A, B). On day 5 of differentiation, the mean diameter of EBs was 263.3 ± 59.6 μm in the Vc group, 179.6 ± 30.3 μm in the CIS group, and 222.7 ± 42.1 μm in the control group. β1 integrin blocking led to a marked decrease in EB size to 127.0 ± 22.2 μm (Figure 4B). The mean diameter of EBs produced via the hanging drop method was not significantly altered by β1 integrin blocking (data not shown). Phase-contract and fluorescent micrographs of miPSC-derived EBs formed after β1 integrin blocking revealed a loose outer layer lacking a dense shell as observed in control EBs (Figure 4C). Scanning electron micrographs revealed the formation of a smooth outer layer resulting from extracellular matrix deposition in control EBs (day 5), in contrast to a cilium-like surface topography lacking a dense shell-like layer in EBs formed after β1 integrin blocking (Figure 4D).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Blocking of collagen/β 1 integrin interaction inhibits the growth and shell formation of miPSC-derived EBs. (A) Morphology of miPSC-derived EBs after treatment with Vc (collagen stimulator), CIS (collagen inhibitor) or β1 integrin blocking antibody. β1 integrin blocking resulted in delayed growth of EBs and a rough edge. (B) Size analysis revealed that the mean diameter of EBs, compared with that of the control group, was larger in the Vc group and smaller in the CIS and β1 integrin blocking groups (*p < 0.05). The data were obtained from five sample EBs per field in 10 fields, and three independent experiments were performed. (C) Phase-contrast and fluorescent micrographs of miPSC-derived EBs grown as hanging drop with or without β1 integrin blocking. Arrows indicate the loose outer layer and the absence of a dense shell. (D) Scanning electron micrographs of 5-day-old EBs with or without β1 integrin blocking. A fibrous ECM coating and a smooth exterior were observed in control EBs (left column). In contrast, the surface topography of EBs with β1 integrin blocking was characterized by a cilium-like structure and the absence of a dense shell-like layer (right column). Scale bars = 200 μm.

Decreased cardiac differentiation of miPSC-derived EBs after β1 integrin blocking

To assess whether blocking of collagen/β1 integrin interaction during EB formation affects the cardiac lineage commitment of miPSCs, miPSC-derived EBs formed with or without β1 integrin blocking were differentiated using a standard protocol (Figure 5A). From day 6 to day 28 of differentiation, plated EBs were examined for spontaneous beating activity. During the time course of cardiac differentiation, the percentage of beating EBs in the β1 integrin blocking group was lower than that in the control group (Figure 5B). The percentage of beating EBs continued to increase until day 16 of differentiation and reached plateau values of 18.0 ± 3.0% in the β1 integrin blocking group and 33.8 ± 4.4% in the control group. On day 21, the beating EBs were immunostained for cardiac troponin T (cTnT) to characterize the cardiac-specific protein. This immunostaining revealed organized sarcomeric myofilaments in the control group in contrast to less cTnT staining and unorganized myofilaments in the β1 integrin blocking group (Figure 5C).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Decreased cardiac differentiation of miPSC-derived EBs formed after blocking of collagen/β 1 integrin interaction. (A) Schematic protocol of cardiac differentiation from miPSCs. Vc, CIS or β1 integrin blocking antibody was administered prior to EB formation. (B) Time course quantification of spontaneous beating activity of differentiated cardiomyocytes was expressed as the percentage of beating EBs. Error bars indicate SEM. (C) Immunostaining for cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) of miPSC-derived cardiomyocytes on day 21. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 20 μm. (D, E) Gene expression profiles of cardiac-related transcription factors (GATA-4, Mef2c, Nkx2.5) and cardiac-specific structural genes (α-MHC, MLC2a, MLC2v) were analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR (D) and real-time PCR (E). Treatment with β1 integrin blocking antibody decreased the expression of these factors and genes. Expression levels of each gene were normalized to β-actin or GAPDH. Mean fold change relative to control and SD from triplicate experiments are shown. *p < 0.05 relative to control.

To characterize the cardiomyocyte phenotype, we included a series of marker genes in the study. GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA-4), NK2 transcription factor related locus 5 (Nkx2.5), and myocyte enhancer factor 2C (Mef2c) were included as markers for cardiac mesoderm. α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) and myosin light chain 2 atrial and ventricular transcripts (MLC2a, MLC2v) were included as markers for cardiomyocytes. The semiquantitative RT-PCR and real-time PCR results both demonstrated that all of the above cardiac-specific markers were decreased significantly in the miPSC-derived EBs formed after β1 integrin blocking (Figure 5D, E). These findings indicate that blocking of collagen/β1 integrin interaction during EB formation leads to decreased cardiac differentiation of miPSCs.


EB formation, which recapitulates various aspects of early embryonic development and displays a high degree of self-organization [14], has been commonly used to induce lineage-specific differentiation of ESCs and iPSCs. The typical characteristics of EB formation, such as EB size and shape, are important parameters that influence cardiac lineage commitment [1517]. Collagen, the major component of ECM, has been shown to enhance cardiac cell engraftment [18] and cardiac differentiation [19] through integrin-mediated interactions between the cells and collagen. There is increasing evidence that ECM/integrin interactions are essential for stem cell differentiation, attachment and proliferation during early embryonic development [9, 13]. We hypothesized that collagen/β1 integrin interaction plays an essential role in the formation and cardiac differentiation of iPSC-derived EBs, which closely resembles early embryonic development. To test this hypothesis, we examined the expression patterns of collagen and integrins during EB formation. Our findings, consistent with those of a previous study [20], showed that undifferentiated mESCs and miPSCs expressed integrin α1 and β1 but not integrin α2. During EB formation, collagen and β1 integrin were upregulated synergistically and peaked on day 3 of differentiation, suggesting that the collagen/β1 integrin interaction may be involved in EB formation.

We used two common culture techniques, the hanging drop method and static suspension. Static suspension culture is performed by adding a suspension of ESCs or iPSCs to a bacteriological Petri dish and allowing the cells to aggregate spontaneously via cell-cell adhesion [21]. This method was used to assess the effect of collagen/β1 integrin interaction on the growth of miPSC-derived EBs. The size and shape of the EBs resulting from static suspension culture tend to be heterogeneous [21], and this phenomenon has been shown to influence cardiac lineage-specific differentiation [1517]. Such heterogeneity is avoided by the hanging drop method, in which a defined number of isolated mESCs or miPSCs are added to a drop where they aggregate [22]. To exclude the confounding effect of size heterogeneity on cardiac differentiation, we used the hanging drop method to investigate the effect of collagen/β1 integrin interaction on the cardiac differentiation of miPSCs.

The size analysis of EBs formed by static suspension culture showed that EB size was increased by treatment with ascorbic acid (a collagen stimulator) but decreased by treatment with CIS (a collagen inhibitor), indicating that collagen synthesis is potent regulator of EB growth. Treatment with β1 integrin blocking antibody produced a greater decrease in EB size, indicating the essential role of collagen/β1 integrin interaction in the control of EB size. The size of EBs formed by the hanging drop method was not affected by treatment with β1 integrin blocking antibody. However, the EBs formed by this method following β1 integrin blocking did not form a dense shell-like layer as is observed in normal EBs [23, 24]. During EB formation, a layer of primitive endoderm is often formed on the exterior surface following cell aggregation [25]. Consistent with our observation that EBs failed to form a dense shell-like layer following β1 integrin blocking, another recent study demonstrated that β1 integrin blocking in differentiating EBs resulted in the detachment of this endoderm layer from the EB surface [26].

Because EB size and shape have been shown to play essential roles in cardiac lineage commitment [1517], we investigated whether β1 integrin blocking during EB formation affects the cardiac lineage commitment of miPSCs. A study of spontaneous beating activity, the quantification of cardiac-specific gene expression and cTnT immunostaining all revealed decreased cardiac differentiation in miPSC-derived EBs formed after the blocking of collagen/β1 integrin interaction. In addition, we also assessed some markers related to the structural/maturity characteristics of cardiomyocytes, such as cTnI, MLC2a, and MLC2v. cTnT staining showed that iPSCs-derived cardiomyocytes failed to form organized sarcomeric myofilaments with β1 integrin blocking as that in the control group (Figure 5C), and measurement of MLC2a and MLC2c revealed decreased expression after integrin β1 disruption (Figure 5D, E). Moreover, organized myofilaments and high MLC2v expression are also considered as markers for mature cardiomyocytes [27]. These results suggested that the structure and maturity of iPSCs-derived cardiomyocytes were impaired by integrin β1 blocking. In conclusion, our findings indicate that collagen/β1 integrin interaction is required for the growth and cardiac differentiation of miPSC-derived EBs. This information will be helpful in future engineering of the EB microenvironment to promote the cardiac differentiation of pluripotent stem cells.

In the developing embryo, the native ECM plays a central role by mediating biophysical stimuli, biochemical and molecular signals and spatial organization. The process of constant interchange between cells and the ECM, termed dynamic reciprocity, determines cell fate and triggers the shift from proliferation to structure formation [28]. As main components of native ECM, collagen may be involved in the development of many organs through integrin-mediated signaling events. Our results revealed that integrin β1 disruption resulted in decreased cardiomyocytes differentiation, but whether other cell lineages will be affected by integrin β1 disruption remained to be further investigated (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Moreover, the potential mechanism remained unclear, although we excluded the possibility that the loss of pluripotency is not affected by integrin β1 blocking (Additional file 2: Figure S2). These effects of integrin disruption may relate to the loosely formed EBs which lack some structure that are essential for cardiogenesis.


In summary, our study demonstrated that blockage of collagen/β1 integrin interaction inhibited the quality and growth of miPSC-derived EBs, resulting in reduced EB size and decreased cardiac differentiation potential. These findings indicated the essential role of collagen/β1 integrin interaction in cardiac lineage commitment of miPSCs during EB formation, and will shed light on engineering matrix microenvironment within EBs to efficiently direct the cardiac fate of pluripotent stem cells.


Culture of mESCs and miPSCs

The miPSCs used in this study (kindly provided by Duanqing Pei, Chinese Academy of Sciences), which carry the GFP transgene targeted to the Oct4 locus, were generated by retroviral transduction of adult fibroblasts from OG2 mice with pMX-based retroviral vectors encoding the transcription factors Oct4 and Sox2. Undifferentiated mESCs (CGR8) and miPSCs were cultured on a mitotically inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF; 50,000 cells/cm2) feeder layer or on gelatin-coated dishes as described previously [29]. The culture medium consisted of 85% knockout high-glucose glutamine-free DMEM with sodium pyruvate, supplemented with 15% serum replacement, 2 mM GlutaMAX, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid stock, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 1000 U/ml murine leukemia inhibitory factor (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The culture medium was changed daily, and the cells were passaged every 2–3 days to maintain their undifferentiated state.

EB formation via hanging drop method and static suspension culture

Before the initiation of differentiation, mESC and miPSC colonies were passaged up to 3 times on gelatin-coated dishes without feeder cells to eliminate contaminating MEFs. Before EB induction, adherent cells were enzymatically dissociated into single cells using 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen). For the hanging drop method, EBs were formed in hanging drops consisting of 500 cells in 20 μl of differentiation medium. For static suspension culture, dissociated cells were cultured to form spheroids (EBs) using a 3-dimensional culture system in the differentiation medium on uncoated Petri dishes (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC). At day 3 of differentiation, the EBs were transferred onto ultra-low attachment 6-well plates (Corning, Cat. No. 3471) in suspension culture for 2 additional days. The differentiation medium was based on high-glucose glutamine-free DMEM and supplemented with 20% ES-qualified fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 2 mM GlutaMAX, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid stock, and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol.

To elucidate the role of collagen/β1 integrin interaction in EB formation, ascorbic acid (Vc, collagen stimulator; 100 μM, Sigma) or cis-4-hydroxy-D-proline (CIS, collagen inhibitor; 300 μM, Sigma) was administered prior to EB formation. In some experiments, 10 μg/ml β1 integrin blocking antibody (clone Ha2/5, BD Pharmingen) was administered to block collagen/β1 integrin interaction.

Morphological analysis of EBs

Gross morphology was analyzed to determine whether the blocking of collagen/β1 integrin interaction affected the growth of EBs from mESCs and miPSCs. Images of EBs formed by the hanging drop method and by static suspension culture under various conditions were obtained on days 3 and 5. For size analysis, mean diameters were measured using the Image J software program and calculated from more than five sample EBs per field in 10 fields as described previously [30]. When the significant differences were analyzed, the maximum and minimum of diameters in each group were removed to avoid large error. Three or more independent experiments were performed for each time point.

Cardiac differentiation of EBs

Day 5 EBs were plated on 0.1% gelatin-coated 6-well culture plates at a density of ≈ 10 EBs per well. Starting at day 6 of differentiation, the differentiation medium described above was replaced every second day, and each EB outgrowth was examined daily for areas that displayed spontaneous beating.


Whole EBs (day 3) and plated EBs (day 21) were stained to detect collagen and cardiomyocyte proteins, respectively. For Collagen I staining, whole iPSCs-derived EBs (day 3) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 40 min and embedded for frozen sectioning using OCT. Plated EBs (day 21) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature. All samples were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes, and then blocked with 5% BSA for 30 minutes. The cells were incubated overnight with rabbit monoclonal anti-cardiac troponin T antibody (cTnT; Abcam, 1:100) and rabbit monoclonal anti-collagen type I antibody (Abcam, 1:100). After incubation overnight, we identified that there were no Oct4-GFP residue in samples using a fluorescence microscope before incubation with the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. The bound antibodies were visualized by incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG-FITC; Abcam, 1:500) for 40 minutes at 37°C. Then the cells were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma, 1:1000) and analyzed using a fluorescence microscope.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from EBs using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following treatment with Recombinant DNAse I (Takara, Japan) to remove genomic DNA contamination, 400 ng/μl RNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara). The resulting cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using standard methods. Primer sequences and PCR conditions are detailed in Additional file 3: Table S1 and Additional file 4: Table S2. mRNA levels of the target genes were normalized to β-actin or GAPDH. Three replicates were performed for each time point.

SYBR Green real-time PCR studies were performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara). All experiments were conducted in triplicate. Samples were subjected to the following cycle 40 times: 5 minutes at 95°C; 40 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds at 60°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C; a final step of 10 minutes at 72°C and 5 minutes at 4°C. The size of amplicons and the absence of nonspecific products were measured or confirmed using melting curves and gel electrophoresis. The transcripts for β-actin and GAPDH were used for internal normalization. Relative quantification was performed by the CT method.

Scanning electron microscopic analysis

mESCs and miPSC-derived EBs (days 3 and 5) were fixed for 2 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde diluted in sodium cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 1 h. The fixed samples were dehydrated using a series of ethanol solutions of increasing concentration (50%, 70%, 80%, 95%, 100%), critically point dried with CO2, and sputter-coated for 120 s at 2.0 KV using a Polaron SC7640 sputter coater. The samples were observed and photographed using a Philips XL20 scanning electron microscope.

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed by Student’s t-test or 1-way ANOVA with repeated-measures analysis. For all analyses, differences with p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.




embryonic stem cell


induced pluripotent stem cell


embryoid body


extracellular matrix


ascorbic acid





This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31271039). We thank Duanqing Pei, Ph.D. (Guangzhou Institute of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for providing cell line CGR8 (ESCs) and miPSCs.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China


  1. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006, 126 (4): 663-676. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007, 318 (5858): 1917-1920. 10.1126/science.1151526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zwi L, Caspi O, Arbel G, Huber I, Gepstein A, Park IH, Gepstein L: Cardiomyocyte differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation. 2009, 120 (15): 1513-1523. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.868885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mauritz C, Schwanke K, Reppel M, Neef S, Katsirntaki K, Maier LS, Nguemo F, Menke S, Haustein M, Hescheler J: Generation of functional murine cardiac myocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation. 2008, 118 (5): 507-517. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Doetschman TC, Eistetter H, Katz M, Schmidt W, Kemler R: The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985, 87: 27-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lumelsky N, Blondel O, Laeng P, Velasco I, Ravin R, McKay R: Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to insulin-secreting structures similar to pancreatic islets. Science. 2001, 292 (5520): 1389-1394. 10.1126/science.1058866.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bibel M, Richter J, Schrenk K, Tucker KL, Staiger V, Korte M, Goetz M, Barde YA: Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into a defined neuronal lineage. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7 (9): 1003-1009. 10.1038/nn1301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bratt-Leal AM, Carpenedo RL, McDevitt TC: Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation. Biotechnol Prog. 2009, 25 (1): 43-51. 10.1002/btpr.139.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Battista S, Guarnieri D, Borselli C, Zeppetelli S, Borzacchiello A, Mayol L, Gerbasio D, Keene DR, Ambrosio L, Netti PA: The effect of matrix composition of 3D constructs on embryonic stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 2005, 26 (31): 6194-6207. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerecht S, Burdick JA, Ferreira LS, Townsend SA, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G: Hyaluronic acid hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (27): 11298-11303. 10.1073/pnas.0703723104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Czyz J, Wobus A: Embryonic stem cell differentiation: the role of extracellular factors. Differentiation. 2001, 68 (4–5): 167-174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Juliano RL, Haskill S: Signal transduction from the extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1993, 120 (3): 577-585. 10.1083/jcb.120.3.577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyamoto S, Katz BZ, Lafrenie RM, Yamada KM: Fibronectin and integrins in cell adhesion, signaling, and morphogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998, 857: 119-129. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10112.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. ten Berge D, Koole W, Fuerer C, Fish M, Eroglu E, Nusse R: Wnt signaling mediates self-organization and axis formation in embryoid bodies. Cell Stem Cell. 2008, 3 (5): 508-518. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moeller HC, Mian MK, Shrivastava S, Chung BG, Khademhosseini A: A microwell array system for stem cell culture. Biomaterials. 2008, 29 (6): 752-763. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.030.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Valamehr B, Jonas SJ, Polleux J, Qiao R, Guo S, Gschweng EH, Stiles B, Kam K, Luo TJ, Witte ON: Hydrophobic surfaces for enhanced differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (38): 14459-14464. 10.1073/pnas.0807235105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang YS, Chung BG, Ortmann D, Hattori N, Moeller HC, Khademhosseini A: Microwell-mediated control of embryoid body size regulates embryonic stem cell fate via differential expression of WNT5a and WNT11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106 (40): 16978-16983. 10.1073/pnas.0905550106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kutschka I, Chen IY, Kofidis T, Arai T, von Degenfeld G, Sheikh AY, Hendry SL, Pearl J, Hoyt G, Sista R: Collagen matrices enhance survival of transplanted cardiomyoblasts and contribute to functional improvement of ischemic rat hearts. Circulation. 2006, 114 (1 Suppl): I167-I173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sato H, Takahashi M, Ise H, Yamada A, Hirose S, Tagawa Y, Morimoto H, Izawa A, Ikeda U: Collagen synthesis is required for ascorbic acid-enhanced differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 342 (1): 107-112. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee ST, Yun JI, Jo YS, Mochizuki M, van der Vlies AJ, Kontos S, Ihm JE, Lim JM, Hubbell JA: Engineering integrin signaling for promoting embryonic stem cell self-renewal in a precisely defined niche. Biomaterials. 2010, 31 (6): 1219-1226. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurosawa H: Methods for inducing embryoid body formation: in vitro differentiation system of embryonic stem cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007, 103 (5): 389-398. 10.1263/jbb.103.389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopfl G, Gassmann M, Desbaillets I: Differentiating embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2004, 254: 79-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carpenedo RL, Bratt-Leal AM, Marklein RA, Seaman SA, Bowen NJ, McDonald JF, McDevitt TC: Homogeneous and organized differentiation within embryoid bodies induced by microsphere-mediated delivery of small molecules. Biomaterials. 2009, 30 (13): 2507-2515. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sachlos E, Auguste DT: Embryoid body morphology influences diffusive transport of inductive biochemicals: a strategy for stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 2008, 29 (34): 4471-4480. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maurer J, Nelson B, Cecena G, Bajpai R, Mercola M, Terskikh A, Oshima RG: Contrasting expression of keratins in mouse and human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (10): e3451-10.1371/journal.pone.0003451.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu J, He X, Corbett SA, Lowry SF, Graham AM, Fassler R, Li S: Integrins are required for the differentiation of visceral endoderm. J Cell Sci. 2009, 122 (Pt 2): 233-242.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mummery CL, Zhang J, Ng ES, Elliott DA, Elefanty AG, Kamp TJ: Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes: a methods overview. Circ Res. 2012, 111 (3): 344-358. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227512.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson CM, Bissell MJ: Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006, 22: 287-309. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104315.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Esteban MA, Wang T, Qin B, Yang J, Qin D, Cai J, Li W, Weng Z, Chen J, Ni S: Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010, 6 (1): 71-79. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou J, Zhang Y, Lin Q, Liu Z, Wang H, Duan C, Wang Y, Hao T, Wu K, Wang C: Embryoid bodies formation and differentiation from mouse embryonic stem cells in collagen/Matrigel scaffolds. J Genet Genomics. 2010, 37 (7): 451-460. 10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60064-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Zeng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.