Skip to main content

Connexinopathies: a structural and functional glimpse

Abstract

Mutations in human connexin (Cx) genes have been related to diseases, which we termed connexinopathies. Such hereditary disorders include nonsyndromic or syndromic deafness (Cx26, Cx30), Charcot Marie Tooth disease (Cx32), occulodentodigital dysplasia and cardiopathies (Cx43), and cataracts (Cx46, Cx50). Despite the clinical phenotypes of connexinopathies have been well documented, their pathogenic molecular determinants remain elusive. The purpose of this work is to identify common/uncommon patterns in channels function among Cx mutations linked to human diseases. To this end, we compiled and discussed the effect of mutations associated to Cx26, Cx32, Cx43, and Cx50 over gap junction channels and hemichannels, highlighting the function of the structural channel domains in which mutations are located and their possible role affecting oligomerization, gating and perm/selectivity processes.

Background

Connexin gap junction channels (GJCs) and hemichannels (HCs) are critical for cellular communication. GJCs allow the intercellular exchange of ions and small molecules (e.g., IP3, cAMP, cGMP, ATP) and diverse metabolites (e.g., sugars, amino acids, glutathione) (reviewed in [1]). The same molecules and ions can pass through HCs, but in this case to take part as autocrine and paracrine signals (reviewed by [2], [3]). Mutations in connexins (Cxs) genes are associated to genetic disorders such as skin abnormalities, cardiopathies, neurodegenerative and developmental diseases, cataracts, and most cases of hereditary deafness (reviewed by [4]–[6]).

Each HC is formed by the oligomerization of six Cxs subunits and the end-to-end docking of two HCs forms GJCs. The membrane topology of Cxs includes four transmembrane domains (designated as TM1-TM4) connected by two extracellular loops (ECL) and one intracellular loop (ICL). The amino terminus (NT) and the carboxyl terminus (CT) segments are cytoplasmic (Fig. 1a). Despite Cxs share high homology, there are important differences in the amino acid sequence of the ICL and CT. These segments contain motifs for regulatory kinases and cytoskeletal binding proteins [7], [8]. Oligomerization between suited isoforms also contributes to the assortment of Cx-based channels; for instances, heteromeric GJCs (HCs constituted by more than one Cxs type) and/or heterotypic channels (two homomeric HCs each made by a different Cxs type). These combinations may produce GJCs with particular functional and regulatory properties. Several works pointed out to TM3 in Cx32 [9]–[11] and Cx43 [12], and TM1 and NT segments in Cx26 [12], [13] as critical to regulate oligomerization of Cxs. In addition, a salt bridge between residues Glu-146 (TM3) and Arg-32 (TM1) in Cx32; and between Lys-22 (TM1) and Glu-209 (TM4) in Cx26, might sustain intraprotomer stability [14]. Nevertheless, the crystal structure of Cx26 showed that the main interactions between protomers occur at the extracellular side of the TM2 and TM4. Moreover, an aromatic cluster formed by the extracellular loops and TM3 also participates in inter-protomer interaction [15]. However, the oligomerization compatibility between Cxs has been associated to specific residues in the NT region [13], [16].

Fig. 1
figure1

Localization of loss-of-function mutations for Cx26 GJC. a Cartoon representation of a Cx26 monomer, colored with a blue-green gradient from the N- to the CT region. Localization of loss-of-function mutations are colored in red. b Lateral (c) Top (d) Bottom view of the same subunit of (a), in the context of the HC assemble. The HC surface is transparent and white. The figure was generated with PyMol and edited with Gimp

Cxs oligomerize to form a pore whose narrowest part is observed at the ECLs, near the docking zone [15], [17]. As mentioned above, the differences in the amino acid sequences among Cxs may influence the channel properties. It has been proposed that the membrane-spanning regions of Cxs are not only important for intra- and inter- protomer interactions, but they also might determine functional properties such as gating, permeability and the pore’s structure. Concerning the pore composition, there is some controversy about which TMs domains are involved. Some works pointed out the TM3 in Cx32 channels [11], [18] and TM1 in Cx46 channels [19], [20] as principal pore helix components. In support of the role of TM1 as a pore lining segment, it has been proposed that the voltage dependent loop-gating mechanism in the Cx32*Cx43 EL1 chimera (in which the ECL1 of Cx43 replaced the ECL1 of Cx32), involves a rotation of TM1 together with an inward tilt of the six protomers [21]. The 3.5 Å resolution of the Cx26 crystal structure revealed that TM1 is the main constituent of the pore [15] (Fig. 1). The structure also showed that the TM2 lines the pore but in a minor extent, whereas TM3 and TM4 face the hydrophobic membrane environment. The TM1 is tilted, which narrow the pore diameter to 14 Å from the cytoplasmic to the extracellular side of the membrane [15]. More recently, performing molecular dynamic refinements of the crystal structure of Cx26, Kwon and co-workers (2011) [22], shown that the narrow part of the pore could be even smaller.

As it was proposed previously for Cx32 [23] and then confirmed by Maeda and co-workers for Cx26 [15], the Cx-NT domain is located inside the pore, facing the TM1s and forming a funnel like structure that might restricts the pore diameter during gating process [15]. The intra-pore stabilization of the NT is achieved by hydrophobic interactions between residues Trp-3 (NT) and Met-34 (TM1) from neighboring protomers [15]. This interaction was previously proposed by Oshima and co-workers (2007), which found a prominent pore electron-density in the middle of the pore generated by the deafness mutant Cx26M34A. A reduction of this pore electron-density was observed when residues 2-7 (Cx26M34A-del2–7) were deleted [24], confirming the NT as major contributor to the pore occlusion.

Experiments using a chimeric HC of Cx32*Cx43ECL1, have provided more insight about the gating-mechanism of Cx-based channels [21]. In this chimera, the Cys substitution of the Ala residues in positions 40 and 43, located at the TM1/E1 border, form disulphide bonds with adjacent protomers when the cells are bathed in solutions expected to keep HCs closed (5 mM Ca2+or 10 µM Cd2+). These results strongly suggest a role for these residues in the “loop-gating” mechanism and extracellular Ca2+ regulation of HCs [21], [25].

GJCs and HCs gating regulation

How gating and permeability are regulated in Cxs- based channels is a matter of intense debate. To date, three types of gating mechanism have been proposed: 1) The NT as a voltage-sensor domain: that plugs the channel vestibule and contribute to the fast or V(j)-gating [15], [26], 2) The Loop gating: in which extracellular divalent cations (p.g., Ca2+) binds to the extracellular loops and blocks HCs by stabilizing the closed loop gate conformation [25], [27], and 3) The ball-and-chain model: which proposes that the CT as part of a ball-and-chain mechanism to regulate the gating of HCs. The last mechanism involves CT conformational rearrangements elicited by voltage or chemical (pH, redox, phosphorylation) stimuli, which promote a link between this segment and the ICL, and regulates the fast V(j)-gating mechanism [28]–[33]. This interaction requires the formation of alpha helical structures on the ICL peptide, in which the CT binds upon intracellular acidification [30].

Considering the relevance of the aforementioned mechanisms for channel function, it is critical to understand how Cxs mutations linked to diseases impair these processes. In the next sections, we describe genetic diseases associated to four Cxs that we used as models for the purpose of this review. For space reason, we did not include information about other important Cxs with mutations associated to disease, like Cx46 mutations linked to congenital cataracts [6], [34] or increased risk to developing diseases, like in polymorphisms in Cx37 genes associated to cardiovascular diseases [35].

Disease associated to Cx26 mutations

Genetic sensorineural hearing loss is associated mainly to mutations in Cx26 [36] (Table 1). Two clinical phenotypes derive from Cx26 mutations: 1) non-syndromic deafness, in which patients evince moderated to severe deafness with absence of other pathological manifestation; and 2) syndromic deafness, in which profound sensorineural hearing loss is accompanied by a range of severe tissue defects such as the observed in palmoplantar keratoderma [37], [38], keratitis ichthyosis deafness syndrome (KID) [39]–[42], Vohwinkel syndrome [43], histrix-like ichthyosis with deafness syndrome and Bart-Pumphrey syndrome [44], [45].

Table 1 Effect of mutations in Cx26 (GJB2) on the functional state of HCs and GJCs evaluated in a heterologous expression system, the domain that is affected and its phenotype

Among the attempts to identify the pathogenic mechanism of KID syndrome, two transgenic animal models have been developed. They express the Cx26S17F and Cx26G45E mutations in the skin and/or cochlea [46], [47] and exhibit similar phenotypes than humans. Experimental results strongly support that the possible mechanisms in the skin might include the impairment of the epidermal calcium homeostasis and the disruption of the water barrier due to abnormal lipid composition of the stratum corneum [48]. For hearing loss, several hypotheses have been proposed. They include loss of Ca2+ homeostasis and ATP release [49], [50], impaired permeability to Ins(1,3,4) P3 [51], loss of the endocochlear potential by deficient K+ recycling between the epithelial GJ network and the stria vascularis [52], and developmental malformation or cochlear degeneration induced by massive cell death [53], [54]. For comprehensive reviews see [4], [55].

Disease associated to Cx32 mutations

Cx32 is expressed in several cell types, including the myelin-forming cells in both the peripheral and central nervous systems (CNS); the Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes, respectively. Mutations in this protein are associated to the most common X-linked inheritance form of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), a pathology referred as CMT1X that accounts for the 10 % of all the CMT cases [56]–[58]. Due to its X-linkage, males display moderate to severe symptoms [59], [60], while milder phenotypes are observed in heterozygous females [61], [62].

In the peripheral nervous system, mutations in Cx32 induce progressive muscular atrophy and variable sensory loss, symptoms associated to slow axonal conduction and distal axonal loss [63]. However, prolonged central conductions times of sensory inputs also arise as consequence of Cx32 missense mutations [64]–[66].

Cx32 localizes in the axonal paranodes and Schmidt-Lantermann incisures [67]–[69] of the peripheral nerves. Hence, GJC made by this protein do not connect adjacent cells but contiguous loops of non-compact myelin. These channels likely act as a preferential diffusion pathway, significantly decreasing the distance between the nucleus and the adaxonal membrane of the myelin sheaths [67], [70].

The peripheral pathological mechanisms associated to Cx32 mutations possibly involve the loss of function of the GJC (Table 2), either by intracellular retention or the production of channels with aberrant properties [70]–[72]. This lack of functionality might reduce the transfer of signaling molecules, like cAMP, between the adaxonal portions and the nucleus of the Schwann cell [73].

Table 2 Effect of mutations in Cx32 (GJB1) on the functional state of HCs and GJCs evaluated in a heterologous expression system, the domain that is affected and its phenotype

Furthermore, at least some effects of Cx32 mutations have been associated to a gain of function of the GJC (Table 2). Nevertheless, this is based on indirect electrophysiological studies performed in two patients who do not express Cx32; these patients display visual and auditory evoked responses with normal central conduction times [74], [75]. However, the absence of central functional disruptions in most CMT1X patients and Cx32-KO animals supports the hypothesis of gain of function of GJC in patients where disease also affects CNS [61], [76], [77]. However, further studies about the functional properties of the Cx32 channels are required to support these hypothesis.

Disease associated to Cx43 mutations

Oculodentodigital Dysplasia (ODDD) is the most important human disease related to Cx43 mutations (Table 3). ODDD is a autosomal inherited developmental disorder affecting face, eyes, teeth and limbs (reviewed in [1], [78]). This pathology was linked to a germ line Cx43 gene (GJA1) mutation [79]. The phenotype varies from syndactyli type III alone, to ODDD without syndactyli [80], [81], camptodactyli [79], cardiac impairments, mild cognitive retardation [82] and skeletal abnormalities, which could be associated to impaired osteoblast differentiation [83].

Table 3 Effect of mutations in Cx43 (GJA1) on the functional state of HCs and GJCs evaluated in a heterologous expression system, the domain that is affected and its phenotype

Currently, over 74 mutations related with ODDD have been reported. However, less than a half of these mutations have been characterized. Missense mutations of Cx43 associated to ODDD are spread through Cx43 amino acid sequence without a clear pattern (Table 3). However, most mutations concentrate in the first half of the protein, with few localized at the CT region (Table 3). The CT domain has several residues that may be phosphorylated, and these allow the regulation of processes like communication, trafficking to the plasma membrane and assembly and degradation of the gap junction protein [84]. The CT also interacts with the ZO-1 [85], v-Scr [86] and other proteins, including cytoskeletal proteins [87].

Several mutations associated to ODDD are located in the ICL region of Cx43 (Table 3), demonstrating the importance of this domain for Cx43 based channels functionality. ICL is critical for both, the pH-mediated gating and the architecture of the channel pore [88]. For example, the ODDD mutant Cx43G138R, which is located in this domain, results in unfunctional GJCs when expressed in N2A cells [89]–[92]. In contrast, the mutation increases the HC activity determined by ATP release measurements [91]. Moreover, a mouse model carrying this mutation (Cx43G138R) exhibits a phenotype that resembled the observed in humans, i.e., craniofacial alterations, bilateral syndactyli, smaller teeth (microdontia), unspecialized enamel hypoplasia, osteopenia and sparse hair [93].

A principal role of Cx43 GJCs in the myocardium is to allow a rapid and coordinated electrical excitation important for the cardiac-action potential propagation. Cx43 is mainly located at the intercalated discs in the ventricular myocardium. The geometrical arrangement of the discs, as well as the total number of GJCs, seems to be determinant for the characteristic anisotropic conduction of the ventricular myocardium. The atrial myocardium expresses high levels of Cx43 and Cx40 in addition to small quantities of Cx45 [94]. In addition, it has been reported that cells forming the conduction system (responsible for rapid electrical signal localization from the sinoatrial node to the ventricles), express Cx43, Cx45, Cx40, and Cx30 [95], [96]. However, patients with mutation in Cx43 rarely exhibit cardiac problems (Table 3). In addition, congenital heart diseases are not commonly associated to Cx43 mutations [97]. Until now, only a few cases of Cx43 mutations linked to heart diseases have been reported. For example Ser364Pro, which results in viscera atrial heterotaxia [98] restrict GJCs communication in transfected cells. A subsequent work of Thibodeau et al. [99] showed a frameshift mutation in a patient with atrial fibrillation. This modification involves a single nucleotide deletion (c.932delC) with 36 aberrant amino acids with a consecutive stop codon. Interestingly, the mutation was absent in peripheral blood lymphocytes and the immunohistological analysis from left atrial tissue showed areas with normal GJCs localization but at the same time, areas with predominant intracellular retention of Cx.

Disease associated to Cx50 mutations

Fibers and epithelial cells in the eye lens are connected through Cx50 GJCs [100]–[102]. This communication is required to maintain the ionic conditions necessary to avoid the formation of cataract [103], a pathology resulting in the opacity of the lens, restricting the amount of light reaching the retina. The Cx50 mutations (Table 4) have been identified in members of families with inherited cataracts. The phenotype may vary across patients, in which missense locations and frame shifts have been commonly identified (reviewed in [6]).

Table 4 Effect of mutations in Cx50 (GJA8) on the functional state of HCs and GJCs evaluated in a heterologous expression system, the domain that is affected and its phenotype

All Cx50 mutations produce loss of function GJCs, except G46V that produce gain of function GJCs [104]. These mutations could generate both, mislocalization and impaired function of GJCs and HCs (e.g., gating or charge selectivity) [105]–[107]. At cellular level, it is possible that Cx50 mutations affect the intercellular communication mediated by heteromeric Cx46-Cx50 GJCs. This idea is based on results demonstrating that these Cxs co-localize at GJCs plaques [108]–[110]. The defective GJCs activity could alter the solute transport between cells and disrupt the Ca2+ homeostasis [111], [112]. The abnormal ion transport, especially Na+ ions, causes lens swelling and ameliorates the fluid circulation inside the structure. These abnormal processes might affect the nutrient transport and the clearance of noxious metabolites, triggering the cataract formation [112].

Location of mutations associated to diseases and their functional consequences on GJC and HCs

Taking advantage of the natural occurring mutations in Cxs and previous studies focuses in the effect of disease-associated mutations on the functional state of GJCs and HCs, we looked for similarities and differences between Cxs regarding the positions of mutations associated to the respective diseases and its functional consequences on GJCs and HCs.

Tables summarize experimental results on GJCs and HCs obtained for different Cxs and disease conditions. They show that independent of the disease and Cx, all mutations produce loss of function of the GJCs, which can be partial or total. The decreased GJCs activity can be consequence of reduced amount of channels in the appositional membranes or changes in the functional properties of single channels.

It has been well established that a loss of function of the GJCs elicited by Cx mutations is sufficient to develop pathology. However, it is not clear if the extent of the loss of function is related to the severity of the disease. An institutive reasoning is that there is a good positive correlation between the severity of the Cx-linked disease and the loss of function of the corresponding GJCs. Unfortunately, the experimental data do not support this statement. On one side, positive correlation can be found when the analysis is restricted to some missense non-syndromic Cx26 mutations (V37I and A40G). While these genetic modifications induce GJCs with loss of function (A40G) and active channels with reduced permeability (V37I) [113], they produce a severe deafness phenotype and a milder condition, respectively [4]. However, a clear correlation cannot be established when other mutations are analyzed, such as some Cx32 mutations associated to a mild to moderate (Null111-116) and moderate to severe (R220X) CMTX1 phenotypes. As expected, the permeability of these channels to different dye tracers decreases as the size of the probe increases [114]. However, unlike the channels containing the Null111-116 mutation, permeability of the R220X-Cx32 GJCs to small probes (neurobiotin) is not significantly different from that observed in wild type channels [115]. In the same region (TM1-ECL1) other mutations cause nonfunctional GJCs and HCs (eg. E48K, D47N, S50P) [110], [116]–[118]. In contrast, Cx50 W45S acts as a dominant negative when co-expressed with Cx50, reducing GJCs coupling between fibers cells [106]. The above evidences suggest that the disease mechanisms might be produced by subtle changes in GJCs permeability, which are impossible to detect by the common electrophysiological and dye coupling methodologies.

In order to know the location of mutations in the channel structure, we produced several molecular models of the different Cxs by homology modeling, taking the crystal structure of Cx26 GJC published by Maeda et al., (2009) as template [15]. Due to the lack of experimental structure for human Cx32, Cx43 and Cx50, we generated comparative structural models, using Modeller [119], based on the structure of human Cx26 as a template (pdb: 2ZW3) (Figs. 2 and 3). Missing residues of human Cx26 structure were inserted with Modeller. The backbone of the experimental Cx26 structure was fully conserved. Ten models were generated in each case and those with the lowest discrete optimized protein energy (DOPE) score were selected as the final models. Figure 1 shows the model of a Cx26 monomer in the context of the connexon as well the location of residues mutated in genetic deafness that produce loss of function GJCs. Clearly, although loss of function mutations can be located everywhere in the protomer, they are concentrated from the NT to the TM2 domains (Fig. 1), regions that line the pore and are critical for voltage gating, as we mentioned earlier [120]. Moreover, other mutations in the transmembrane regions seem to be located in protein-protein and protein-lipid interfaces (Fig. 1b, c). Those locations could be important for intra- or inter-protomer interactions [121], which might stabilize the channel or contribute GJCs channel assembly. For Cx32, the pattern for location of mutations that produced loss of function GJCs is very similar to that observed for Cx26 (Fig. 2b), suggesting strong similarities in the structural features between these two Cxs. For Cxs 43 and 50, mutations that produce loss of GJCs function are more restricted. The fact that they localize mostly from NT to ECL1 (Fig. 2c, d) confirms the importance of this region for the channel function in the whole Cx family. However, the ICL Cx43 also presents important amount of mutations producing loss of function GJCs (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Mutations affecting function of GJCs. Models of single Cxs chains are represented as cartoons, and colored with a blue-green gradient from the N- to the CT region, for (a) Cx26 (b) Cx32, (c) Cx43 and (d) Cx50. Positions of loss of function mutations are colored as red and gain of function mutations as yellow. The figure was generated with Pymol and edited with Gimp

Fig. 3
figure3

Mutations affecting function of HCs. Models of single Cxs chains are represented as cartoons, and colored with a blue-green gradient from the N- to the CT region, for (a) Cx26 (b) Cx32, (c) Cx43 and (d) Cx50. Positions of loss of function mutations are colored as red and gain of function mutations as yellow. The figure was generated with PyMol and edited with Gimp

Mutations affecting HCs function

The HCs play important role in physiological and pathological conditions since they provide a route for paracrine/autocrine signaling between the cell and the extracellular environment [2], [122]. Hence, a plausible underlying mechanism for connexinopathies is the possibility that some disease condition arise upon HCs dysfunction. For example, aberrant gain of function HCs is associated to syndromic Cx26 mutations that lead to keratitis ichthyosis deafness syndrome (KID) [13], [123], [124]. For the other Cxs (Cx32, Cx43 and Cx50), very few cases have been reported making it difficult to establish a common mechanism of disease (Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4). Exceptions are some mutations in Cx32 (S85C and F235C), which induce aberrant gain of HC activity in CMTX1 [125], [126], which behaves similar to the KID-linked Cx26 mutations, i.e., causing a gain of function of the HCs [125] and a loss of function of the GJCs [127]. Although the S85C mutant induces abnormal HCs opening [128], this mutation has not been associated to any particular severe phenotype of CMTX1 [129].

Most of the mutations eliciting gain of HCs function are clustered exclusively in the pore lining residues of the NT, TM1 and the ECL1. They also localize in TM2 to a lesser extent (Fig. 3). In the case of Cx26, several mutations related to severe clinical phenotypes of KID are located at the transition zone between TM1 and the ECL1, a domain involved in both voltage gating and the control of HCs by extracellular Ca2+ [25]. Moreover, a cluster of syndromic mutations is found in the NT domain of the protein, which is involved in the fast gating of HCs [24], [130]. Nevertheless, a role of other regions on the regulation of HCs should be further considered. For example, the Cx32 mutation F235C, localized in the CT of the protein also induces HCs with gain of function [126].

The gain of HCs function has been also observed in Cx43 related connexinopathies, since mutations I31M (TM1), G138R (ICL) and G143S (ICL), all promotes gain of function (Table 3). As mentioned above, ICL is involved in regulation the fast V(j)-gating, which depend on the interaction with CT [28]–[32]. Moreover, Dobrowolski and co-workers (2008) [93] found an increased ATP-release in cultured cardiomyocytes from cardiac specific G138R-mutant mice. Interestingly, the authors proposed that HCs with gain of function in G138R-mutated cardiomyocytes might be one of the causes of arrhythmias.

As expected, some mutations induce loss of function HCs (Table 1 and Fig. 3). For example, mutations related to non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss generate non-functional HCs [113]. Indeed, there are some syndromic mutations that exhibit non-functional HCs that only become gain of function when are co-expressed with their wild type partner or under aberrant interaction with Cx43 [13], [131].

Finally, It should be considering that in normal tissues cells could express several Cxs isoforms raising the possibility of interaction among Cxs isoforms. Recent results obtained in Dr. Martinez’ lab [13] and Dr. White’s group [131] suggest that the interaction between the mutated Cx and the co-expressed Cxs forming heterotypic/heteromeric channels needs to be taking into account to explain the clinical phenotypes of connexinopathies. Thus, interaction of mutants with wild type Cxs might ameliorate or worsen the clinical phenotypes. This possibility might augment when mutations affect critical segment involved in oligomerization compatibility, giving rise to aberrant heteromeric HCs, which makes pathological condition and effective treatment complex. In this scenario, further studies attempting to explore the pathological mechanism of connexinopathies should consider to study Cxs in heteromeric rather than homomeric states, which more closely resembles native cellular conditions.

Conclusions

Most mutations causing connexinopathies generates total or partial loss of GJCs function. However, it is unclear if the severity of disease correlates with the level of GJCs loss of function. Mutations associated with loss of function GJCs are distributed along the entire protein sequence with no clear pattern of clustering at any segment, which suggest that GJC functionality is very sensitive to minor changes in Cxs protein, and that subtle changes in GJC functionality are sufficient to cause diseases. Less in known about the effect of mutations associated to connexinopathies on the functional state of HCs. The clearest correlation between gain of function HCs and disease has been found in most types of syndromic deafness associated to Cx26, in particular in KID syndrome. For others Cxs, few mutations are associated to gain of HCs function, however, we can not discard that this condition may be underestimated because most studies in the past have been more focused in GJCs than HCs. Therefore, it is yet difficult to make a general statement that represent all Cxs associated to connexinopathies. Nevertheless, it is clear that all mutations eliciting gain of HCs function are clustered in pore-associated domains like the NT and the TM1/ECL1, which are critical regions for gating and regulation.

References

  1. 1.

    Laird DW: Syndromic and non-syndromic disease-linked Cx43 mutations. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588 (8): 1339-1348.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sáez JC, Berthoud VM, Branes MC, Martínez AD, Beyer EC: Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: their regulation and functions. Physiol Rev. 2003, 83 (4): 1359-1400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Harris AL: Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap. Q Rev Biophys. 2001, 34 (3): 325-472.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martínez AD, Acuña R, Figueroa V, Maripillán J, Nicholson B: Gap-junction channels dysfunction in deafness and hearing loss. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009, 11 (2): 309-322.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Delmar M, Makita N: Cardiac connexins, mutations and arrhythmias. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012, 27 (3): 236-241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Beyer EC, Ebihara L, Berthoud VM: Connexin mutants and cataracts. Front Pharmacol. 2013, 4: 43

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Laird DW, Castillo M, Kasprzak L: Gap junction turnover, intracellular trafficking, and phosphorylation of connexin43 in brefeldin A-treated rat mammary tumor cells. J Cell Biol. 1995, 131 (5): 1193-1203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lampe PD, Lau AF: Regulation of gap junctions by phosphorylation of connexins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000, 384 (2): 205-215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ahmad S, Martin PE, Evans WH: Assembly of gap junction channels: mechanism, effects of calmodulin antagonists and identification of connexin oligomerization determinants. Eur J Biochem. 2001, 268 (16): 4544-4552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Maza J, Das Sarma J, Koval M: Defining a minimal motif required to prevent connexin oligomerization in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (22): 21115-21121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fleishman SJ, Unger VM, Yeager M, Ben-Tal N: A Calpha model for the transmembrane alpha helices of gap junction intercellular channels. Mol Cell. 2004, 15 (6): 879-888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Martinez AD, Maripillan J, Acuna R, Minogue PJ, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC: Different domains are critical for oligomerization compatibility of different connexins. Biochem J. 2011, 436 (1): 35-43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    García IE, Maripillán J, Jara O, Ceriani R, Palacios-Muñoz A, Ramachandran J, Olivero P, Perez-Acle T, González C, Sáez JC, et al: Keratitis-Ichthyosis-Deafness Syndrome-Associated Cx26 Mutants Produce Nonfunctional Gap Junctions but Hyperactive Hemichannels When Co-Expressed With Wild Type Cx43. J Invest Dermatol. 2015, 135 (5): 1338-1347.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fleishman SJ, Sabag AD, Ophir E, Avraham KB, Ben-Tal N: The structural context of disease-causing mutations in gap junctions. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (39): 28958-28963.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Maeda S, Nakagawa S, Suga M, Yamashita E, Oshima A, Fujiyoshi Y, Tsukihara T: Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Nature. 2009, 458 (7238): 597-602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lagree V, Brunschwig K, Lopez P, Gilula NB, Richard G, Falk MM: Specific amino-acid residues in the N-terminus and TM3 implicated in channel function and oligomerization compatibility of connexin43. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (Pt 15): 3189-3201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Unger VM, Kumar NM, Gilula NB, Yeager M: Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science. 1999, 283 (5405): 1176-1180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Skerrett IM, Aronowitz J, Shin JH, Cymes G, Kasperek E, Cao FL, Nicholson BJ: Identification of amino acid residues lining the pore of a gap junction channel. J Cell Biol. 2002, 159 (2): 349-360.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhou XW, Pfahnl A, Werner R, Hudder A, Llanes A, Luebke A, Dahl G: Identification of a pore lining segment in gap junction hemichannels. Biophys J. 1997, 72 (5): 1946-1953.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kronengold J, Trexler EB, Bukauskas FF, Bargiello TA, Verselis VK: Single-channel SCAM identifies pore-lining residues in the first extracellular loop and first transmembrane domains of Cx46 hemichannels. J Gen Physiol. 2003, 122 (4): 389-405.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tang Q, Dowd TL, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA: Conformational changes in a pore-forming region underlie voltage-dependent “loop gating” of an unapposed connexin hemichannel. J Gen Physiol. 2009, 133 (6): 555-570.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kwon T, Harris AL, Rossi A, Bargiello TA: Molecular dynamics simulations of the Cx26 hemichannel: evaluation of structural models with Brownian dynamics. J Gen Physiol. 2011, 138 (5): 475-493.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Purnick PE, Benjamin DC, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA, Dowd TL: Structure of the amino terminus of a gap junction protein. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000, 381 (2): 181-190.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Oshima A, Tani K, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Sosinsky GE: Three-dimensional structure of a human connexin26 gap junction channel reveals a plug in the vestibule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (24): 10034-10039.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Verselis VK, Srinivas M: Divalent cations regulate connexin hemichannels by modulating intrinsic voltage-dependent gating. J Gen Physiol. 2008, 132 (3): 315-327.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Oh S, Bargiello TA: Voltage regulation of connexin channel conductance. Yonsei Med J. 2015, 56 (1): 1-15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gomez-Hernandez JM, de Miguel M, Larrosa B, Gonzalez D, Barrio LC: Molecular basis of calcium regulation in connexin-32 hemichannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (26): 16030-16035.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Solan JL, Lampe PD: Connexin43 phosphorylation: structural changes and biological effects. Biochem J. 2009, 419 (2): 261-272.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Spray DC, Burt JM: Structure-activity relations of the cardiac gap junction channel. Am J Phys. 1990, 258 (2 Pt 1): C195-C205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hirst-Jensen BJ, Sahoo P, Kieken F, Delmar M, Sorgen PL: Characterization of the pH-dependent interaction between the gap junction protein connexin43 carboxyl terminus and cytoplasmic loop domains. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (8): 5801-5813.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Elenes S, Martinez AD, Delmar M, Beyer EC, Moreno AP: Heterotypic docking of Cx43 and Cx45 connexons blocks fast voltage gating of Cx43. Biophys J. 2001, 81 (3): 1406-1418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Revilla A, Castro C, Barrio LC: Molecular dissection of transjunctional voltage dependence in the connexin-32 and connexin-43 junctions. Biophys J. 1999, 77 (3): 1374-1383.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Duffy HS, Sorgen PL, Girvin ME, O'Donnell P, Coombs W, Taffet SM, Delmar M, Spray DC. pH-dependent intramolecular binding and structure involving Cx43 cytoplasmic domains. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(39):36706–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Berthoud VM, Minogue PJ, Guo J, Williamson EK, Xu X, Ebihara L, Beyer EC: Loss of function and impaired degradation of a cataract-associated mutant connexin50. Eur J Cell Biol. 2003, 82 (5): 209-221.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yamada Y, Izawa H, Ichihara S, Takatsu F, Ishihara H, Hirayama H, Sone T, Tanaka M, Yokota M: Prediction of the risk of myocardial infarction from polymorphisms in candidate genes. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (24): 1916-1923.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kelsell DP, Dunlop J, Stevens HP, Lench NJ, Liang JN, Parry G, Mueller RF, Leigh IM: Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature. 1997, 387 (6628): 80-83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Richard G, White TW, Smith LE, Bailey RA, Compton JG, Paul DL, Bale SJ: Functional defects of Cx26 resulting from a heterozygous missense mutation in a family with dominant deaf-mutism and palmoplantar keratoderma. Hum Genet. 1998, 103 (4): 393-399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Heathcote K, Syrris P, Carter ND, Patton MA: A connexin 26 mutation causes a syndrome of sensorineural hearing loss and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (MIM 148350). J Med Genet. 2000, 37 (1): 50-51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Arita K, Akiyama M, Aizawa T, Umetsu Y, Segawa I, Goto M, Sawamura D, Demura M, Kawano K, Shimizu H: A novel N14Y mutation in Connexin26 in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: analyses of altered gap junctional communication and molecular structure of N terminus of mutated Connexin26. Am J Pathol. 2006, 169 (2): 416-423.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Richard G, Rouan F, Willoughby CE, Brown N, Chung P, Ryynanen M, Jabs EW, Bale SJ, DiGiovanna JJ, Uitto J, et al: Missense mutations in GJB2 encoding connexin-26 cause the ectodermal dysplasia keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70 (5): 1341-1348.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Bitoun E, Chevrant-Breton J, Man SY, Bodemer C, Prins C, Antille C, Saurat JH, Atherton D, Harper JI, et al: Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: disease expression and spectrum of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in 14 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2007, 156 (5): 1015-1019.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Steensel MA, van Geel M, Nahuys M, Smitt JH, Steijlen PM: A novel connexin 26 mutation in a patient diagnosed with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. J Invest Dermatol. 2002, 118 (4): 724-727.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Maestrini E, Korge BP, Ocana-Sierra J, Calzolari E, Cambiaghi S, Scudder PM, Hovnanian A, Monaco AP, Munro CS: A missense mutation in connexin26, D66H, causes mutilating keratoderma with sensorineural deafness (Vohwinkel’s syndrome) in three unrelated families. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8 (7): 1237-1243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    van Geel M, van Steensel MA, Kuster W, Hennies HC, Happle R, Steijlen PM, Konig A: HID and KID syndromes are associated with the same connexin 26 mutation. Br J Dermatol. 2002, 146 (6): 938-942.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Alexandrino F, Sartorato EL, Marques-de-Faria AP, Steiner CE: G59S mutation in the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene in a patient with Bart-Pumphrey syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 136 (3): 282-284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schütz M, Auth T, Gehrt A, Bosen F, Korber I, Strenzke N, Moser T, Willecke K: The connexin26 S17F mouse mutant represents a model for the human hereditary keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20 (1): 28-39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mese G, Sellitto C, Li L, Wang HZ, Valiunas V, Richard G, Brink PR, White TW: The Cx26-G45E mutation displays increased hemichannel activity in a mouse model of the lethal form of keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Mol Biol Cell. 2011, 22 (24): 4776-4786.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bosen F, Celli A, Crumrine D, Vom Dorp K, Ebel P, Jastrow H, Dormann P, Winterhager E, Mauro T, Willecke K: Altered epidermal lipid processing and calcium distribution in the KID syndrome mouse model Cx26S17F. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589 (15): 1904-1910.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhao HB: Connexin26 is responsible for anionic molecule permeability in the cochlea for intercellular signalling and metabolic communications. Eur J Neurosci. 2005, 21 (7): 1859-1868.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Mammano F: Ca2+ homeostasis defects and hereditary hearing loss. Biofactors. 2011, 37 (3): 182-188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Beltramello M, Piazza V, Bukauskas FF, Pozzan T, Mammano F: Impaired permeability to Ins(1,4,5)P3 in a mutant connexin underlies recessive hereditary deafness. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7 (1): 63-69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhao HB, Kikuchi T, Ngezahayo A, White TW: Gap junctions and cochlear homeostasis. J Membr Biol. 2006, 209 (2–3): 177-186.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cohen-Salmon M, Ott T, Michel V, Hardelin JP, Perfettini I, Eybalin M, Wu T, Marcus DC, Wangemann P, Willecke K, et al: Targeted ablation of connexin26 in the inner ear epithelial gap junction network causes hearing impairment and cell death. Curr Biol: CB. 2002, 12 (13): 1106-1111.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kammen-Jolly K, Ichiki H, Scholtz AW, Gsenger M, Kreczy A, Schrott-Fischer A: Connexin 26 in human fetal development of the inner ear. Hear Res. 2001, 160 (1–2): 15-21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wingard JC, Zhao HB: Cellular and Deafness Mechanisms Underlying Connexin Mutation-Induced Hearing Loss - A Common Hereditary Deafness. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015, 9: 202

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kleopa KA, Abrams CK, Scherer SS: How do mutations in GJB1 cause X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease?. Brain Res. 2012, 1487: 198-205.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Murphy SM, Ovens R, Polke J, Siskind CE, Laura M, Bull K, Ramdharry G, Houlden H, Murphy RP, Shy ME, et al: X inactivation in females with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012, 22 (7): 617-621.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Saporta MA, Shy ME: Inherited peripheral neuropathies. Neurol Clin. 2013, 31 (2): 597-619.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Saporta AS, Sottile SL, Miller LJ, Feely SM, Siskind CE, Shy ME: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease subtypes and genetic testing strategies. Ann Neurol. 2011, 69 (1): 22-33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Latour P, Gonnaud PM, Ollagnon E, Chan V, Perelman S, Stojkovic T, Stoll C, Vial C, Ziegler F, Vandenberghe A, et al: SIMPLE mutation analysis in dominant demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: three novel mutations. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2006, 11 (2): 148-155.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Scherer SS, Xu YT, Nelles E, Fischbeck K, Willecke K, Bone LJ: Connexin32-null mice develop demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Glia. 1998, 24 (1): 8-20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Siskind CE, Shy ME: Genetics of neuropathies. Semin Neurol. 2011, 31 (5): 494-505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Abrams CK, Scherer SS: Gap junctions in inherited human disorders of the central nervous system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012, 1818 (8): 2030-2047.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Nicholson G, Corbett A: Slowing of central conduction in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy shown by brain stem auditory evoked responses. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996, 61 (1): 43-46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Srinivasan J, Leventer RJ, Kornberg AJ, Dahl HH, Ryan MM: Central nervous system signs in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease after hyperventilation. Pediatr Neurol. 2008, 38 (4): 293-295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kassubek J, Bretschneider V, Sperfeld AD: Corticospinal tract MRI hyperintensity in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2005, 12 (5): 588-589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Scherer SS, Deschenes SM, Xu YT, Grinspan JB, Fischbeck KH, Paul DL: Connexin32 is a myelin-related protein in the PNS and CNS. J Neurosci. 1995, 15 (12): 8281-8294.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Altevogt BM, Kleopa KA, Postma FR, Scherer SS, Paul DL: Connexin29 is uniquely distributed within myelinating glial cells of the central and peripheral nervous systems. J Neurosci. 2002, 22 (15): 6458-6470.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Balice-Gordon RJ, Bone LJ, Scherer SS: Functional gap junctions in the schwann cell myelin sheath. J Cell Biol. 1998, 142 (4): 1095-1104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Oh S, Ri Y, Bennett MV, Trexler EB, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA: Changes in permeability caused by connexin 32 mutations underlie X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuron. 1997, 19 (4): 927-938.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bicego M, Morassutto S, Hernandez VH, Morgutti M, Mammano F, D'Andrea P, Bruzzone R. Selective defects in channel permeability associated with Cx32 mutations causing X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21(3):607–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sargiannidou I, Vavlitou N, Aristodemou S, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriacou K, Scherer SS, Kleopa KA: Connexin32 mutations cause loss of function in Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes leading to PNS and CNS myelination defects. J Neurosci. 2009, 29 (15): 4736-4749.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Ressot C, Bruzzone R: Connexin channels in Schwann cells and the development of the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000, 32 (1): 192-202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Takashima H, Nakagawa M, Umehara F, Hirata K, Suehara M, Mayumi H, Yoshishige K, Matsuyama W, Saito M, Jonosono M, et al: Gap junction protein beta 1 (GJB1) mutations and central nervous system symptoms in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003, 107 (1): 31-37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hahn AF, Ainsworth PJ, Bolton CF, Bilbao JM, Vallat JM: Pathological findings in the x-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a morphometric and ultrastructural analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 2001, 101 (2): 129-139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Anzini P, Neuberg DH, Schachner M, Nelles E, Willecke K, Zielasek J, Toyka KV, Suter U, Martini R: Structural abnormalities and deficient maintenance of peripheral nerve myelin in mice lacking the gap junction protein connexin 32. J Neurosci. 1997, 17 (12): 4545-4551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Sutor B, Schmolke C, Teubner B, Schirmer C, Willecke K: Myelination defects and neuronal hyperexcitability in the neocortex of connexin 32-deficient mice. Cereb Cortex. 2000, 10 (7): 684-697.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Molica F, Meens MJ, Morel S, Kwak BR: Mutations in cardiovascular connexin genes. Biol Cell. 2014, 106 (9): 269-293.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Paznekas WA, Boyadjiev SA, Shapiro RE, Daniels O, Wollnik B, Keegan CE, Innis JW, Dinulos MB, Christian C, Hannibal MC, et al: Connexin 43 (GJA1) mutations cause the pleiotropic phenotype of oculodentodigital dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72 (2): 408-418.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Vitiello C, D’Adamo P, Gentile F, Vingolo EM, Gasparini P, Banfi S: A novel GJA1 mutation causes oculodentodigital dysplasia without syndactyly. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 133A (1): 58-60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Richardson RJ, Joss S, Tomkin S, Ahmed M, Sheridan E, Dixon MJ: A nonsense mutation in the first transmembrane domain of connexin 43 underlies autosomal recessive oculodentodigital syndrome. J Med Genet. 2006, 43 (7): e37

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Loddenkemper T, Grote K, Evers S, Oelerich M, Stogbauer F: Neurological manifestations of the oculodentodigital dysplasia syndrome. J Neurol. 2002, 249 (5): 584-595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    McLachlan E, Plante I, Shao Q, Tong D, Kidder GM, Bernier SM, Laird DW: ODDD-linked Cx43 mutants reduce endogenous Cx43 expression and function in osteoblasts and inhibit late stage differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2008, 23 (6): 928-938.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Laird DW: Connexin phosphorylation as a regulatory event linked to gap junction internalization and degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1711 (2): 172-182.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Giepmans BN, Verlaan I, Moolenaar WH: Connexin-43 interactions with ZO-1 and alpha- and beta-tubulin. Cell Commun Adhes. 2001, 8 (4–6): 219-223.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kanemitsu MY, Loo LW, Simon S, Lau AF, Eckhart W: Tyrosine phosphorylation of connexin 43 by v-Src is mediated by SH2 and SH3 domain interactions. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (36): 22824-22831.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Giepmans BN: Gap junctions and connexin-interacting proteins. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 62 (2): 233-245.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Delmar M, Coombs W, Sorgen P, Duffy HS, Taffet SM: Structural bases for the chemical regulation of Connexin43 channels. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 62 (2): 268-275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Seki A, Coombs W, Taffet SM, Delmar M: Loss of electrical communication, but not plaque formation, after mutations in the cytoplasmic loop of connexin43. Heart Rhythm. 2004, 1 (2): 227-233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Roscoe W, Veitch GI, Gong XQ, Pellegrino E, Bai D, McLachlan E, Shao Q, Kidder GM, Laird DW: Oculodentodigital dysplasia-causing connexin43 mutants are non-functional and exhibit dominant effects on wild-type connexin43. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (12): 11458-11466.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Dobrowolski R, Sommershof A, Willecke K: Some oculodentodigital dysplasia-associated Cx43 mutations cause increased hemichannel activity in addition to deficient gap junction channels. J Membr Biol. 2007, 219 (1–3): 9-17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Churko JM, Langlois S, Pan X, Shao Q, Laird DW: The potency of the fs260 connexin43 mutant to impair keratinocyte differentiation is distinct from other disease-linked connexin43 mutants. Biochem J. 2010, 429 (3): 473-483.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Dobrowolski R, Sasse P, Schrickel JW, Watkins M, Kim JS, Rackauskas M, Troatz C, Ghanem A, Tiemann K, Degen J, et al: The conditional connexin43G138R mouse mutant represents a new model of hereditary oculodentodigital dysplasia in humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17 (4): 539-554.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Severs NJ, Bruce AF, Dupont E, Rothery S: Remodelling of gap junctions and connexin expression in diseased myocardium. Cardiovasc Res. 2008, 80 (1): 9-19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Garcia-Dorado D, Rodriguez-Sinovas A, Ruiz-Meana M: Gap junction-mediated spread of cell injury and death during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 61 (3): 386-401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    van Kempen MJ, ten Velde I, Wessels A, Oosthoek PW, Gros D, Jongsma HJ, Moorman AF, Lamers WH: Differential connexin distribution accommodates cardiac function in different species. Microsc Res Tech. 1995, 31 (5): 420-436.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Huang GY, Xie LJ, Linask KL, Zhang C, Zhao XQ, Yang Y, Zhou GM, Wu YJ, Marquez-Rosado L, McElhinney DB, et al: Evaluating the role of connexin43 in congenital heart disease: Screening for mutations in patients with outflow tract anomalies and the analysis of knock-in mouse models. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011, 2 (4): 206-212.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Britz-Cunningham SH, Shah MM, Zuppan CW, Fletcher WH: Mutations of the Connexin43 gap-junction gene in patients with heart malformations and defects of laterality. N Engl J Med. 1995, 332 (20): 1323-1329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Thibodeau IL, Xu J, Li Q, Liu G, Lam K, Veinot JP, Birnie DH, Jones DL, Krahn AD, Lemery R, et al: Paradigm of genetic mosaicism and lone atrial fibrillation: physiological characterization of a connexin 43-deletion mutant identified from atrial tissue. Circulation. 2010, 122 (3): 236-244.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    TenBroek EM, Johnson R, Louis CF: Cell-to-cell communication in a differentiating ovine lens culture system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994, 35 (1): 215-228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Dahm R: Lens fibre cell differentiation - A link with apoptosis?. Ophthalmic Res. 1999, 31 (3): 163-183.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Rong P, Wang X, Niesman I, Wu Y, Benedetti LE, Dunia I, Levy E, Gong X: Disruption of Gja8 (alpha8 connexin) in mice leads to microphthalmia associated with retardation of lens growth and lens fiber maturation. Development. 2002, 129 (1): 167-174.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    White TW, Bruzzone R, Goodenough DA, Paul DL: Mouse Cx50, a functional member of the connexin family of gap junction proteins, is the lens fiber protein MP70. Mol Biol Cell. 1992, 3 (7): 711-720.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Minogue PJ, Tong JJ, Arora A, Russell-Eggitt I, Hunt DM, Moore AT, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM: A mutant connexin50 with enhanced hemichannel function leads to cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009, 50 (12): 5837-5845.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Xu X, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC, Ebihara L: Functional role of the carboxyl terminal domain of human connexin 50 in gap junctional channels. J Membr Biol. 2002, 186 (2): 101-112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Tong JJ, Minogue PJ, Guo W, Chen TL, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM, Ebihara L: Different consequences of cataract-associated mutations at adjacent positions in the first extracellular boundary of connexin50. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011, 300 (5): C1055-C1064.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Beyer EC, Berthoud VM: Connexin hemichannels in the lens. Front Physiol. 2014, 5: 20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Paul DL, Ebihara L, Takemoto LJ, Swenson KI, Goodenough DA: Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1991, 115 (4): 1077-1089.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Jiang JX, Goodenough DA: Heteromeric connexons in lens gap junction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (3): 1287-1291.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Rubinos C, Villone K, Mhaske PV, White TW, Srinivas M: Functional effects of Cx50 mutations associated with congenital cataracts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014, 306 (3): C212-C220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Gao J, Sun X, Martinez-Wittinghan FJ, Gong X, White TW, Mathias RT: Connections between connexins, calcium, and cataracts in the lens. J Gen Physiol. 2004, 124 (4): 289-300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Mathias RT, White TW, Gong X: Lens gap junctions in growth, differentiation, and homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2010, 90 (1): 179-206.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Jara O, Acuna R, Garcia IE, Maripillan J, Figueroa V, Saez JC, Araya-Secchi R, Lagos CF, Perez-Acle T, Berthoud VM, et al: Critical role of the first transmembrane domain of Cx26 in regulating oligomerization and function. Mol Biol Cell. 2012, 23 (17): 3299-3311.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    DeRosa AM, Xia CH, Gong X, White TW: The cataract-inducing S50P mutation in Cx50 dominantly alters the channel gating of wild-type lens connexins. J Cell Sci. 2007, 120 (Pt 23): 4107-4116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Bicego M, Beltramello M, Melchionda S, Carella M, Piazza V, Zelante L, Bukauskas FF, Arslan E, Cama E, Pantano S, et al: Pathogenetic role of the deafness-related M34T mutation of Cx26. Hum Mol Genet. 2006, 15 (17): 2569-2587.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Banks EA, Toloue MM, Shi Q, Zhou ZJ, Liu J, Nicholson BJ, Jiang JX: Connexin mutation that causes dominant congenital cataracts inhibits gap junctions, but not hemichannels, in a dominant negative manner. J Cell Sci. 2009, 122 (Pt 3): 378-388.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Arora A, Minogue PJ, Liu X, Addison PK, Russel-Eggitt I, Webster AR, Hunt DM, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM, et al: A novel connexin50 mutation associated with congenital nuclear pulverulent cataracts. J Med Genet. 2008, 45 (3): 155-160.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    DeRosa AM, Mese G, Li L, Sellitto C, Brink PR, Gong X, White TW: The cataract causing Cx50-S50P mutant inhibits Cx43 and intercellular communication in the lens epithelium. Exp Cell Res. 2009, 315 (6): 1063-1075.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Sali A, Blundell TL: Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993, 234 (3): 779-815.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Bargiello TA, Tang Q, Oh S, Kwon T: Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012, 1818 (8): 1807-1822.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Fleishman SJ, Ben-Tal N: Progress in structure prediction of alpha-helical membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006, 16 (4): 496-504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Retamal MA, Reyes EP, Garcia IE, Pinto B, Martinez AD, Gonzalez C: Diseases associated with leaky hemichannels. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015, 9: 267

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Lee JR, Derosa AM, White TW: Connexin mutations causing skin disease and deafness increase hemichannel activity and cell death when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009, 129 (4): 870-878.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Gerido DA, DeRosa AM, Richard G, White TW: Aberrant hemichannel properties of Cx26 mutations causing skin disease and deafness. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 293 (1): C337-C345.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Abrams CK, Bennett MV, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA: Voltage opens unopposed gap junction hemichannels formed by a connexin 32 mutant associated with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99 (6): 3980-3984.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Liang GS, de Miguel M, Gomez-Hernandez JM, Glass JD, Scherer SS, Mintz M, et al. Severe neuropathy with leaky connexin32 hemichannels. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):749–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Abrams CK, Freidin MM, Verselis VK, Bennett MV, Bargiello TA: Functional alterations in gap junction channels formed by mutant forms of connexin 32: evidence for loss of function as a pathogenic mechanism in the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain Res. 2001, 900 (1): 9-25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Abrams CK, Oh S, Ri Y, Bargiello TA: Mutations in connexin 32: the molecular and biophysical bases for the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000, 32 (1): 203-214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Kleopa KA, Sargiannidou I: Connexins, gap junctions and peripheral neuropathy. Neurosci Lett. 2015, 596: 27-32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Sánchez HA, Verselis VK: Aberrant Cx26 hemichannels and keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: insights into syndromic hearing loss. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8: 354

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Shuja Z, Li L, Gupta S, Mese G, White TW. Connexin26 Mutations Causing Palmoplantar Keratoderma and Deafness Interact with connexin43, Modifying Gap Junction and Hemichannel Properties. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(1):225-35. doi:10.1038/JID.2015.389.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Thonnissen E, Rabionet R, Arbones ML, Estivill X, Willecke K, Ott T: Human connexin26 (GJB2) deafness mutations affect the function of gap junction channels at different levels of protein expression. Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (2): 190-197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Mese G, Londin E, Mui R, Brink PR, White TW: Altered gating properties of functional Cx26 mutants associated with recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2004, 115 (3): 191-199.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Chen Y, Deng Y, Bao X, Reuss L, Altenberg GA: Mechanism of the defect in gap-junctional communication by expression of a connexin 26 mutant associated with dominant deafness. FASEB J. 2005, 19 (11): 1516-1518.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Wu BL, Lindeman N, Lip V, Adams A, Amato RS, Cox G, Irons M, Kenna M, Korf B, Raisen J, et al: Effectiveness of sequencing connexin 26 (GJB2) in cases of familial or sporadic childhood deafness referred for molecular diagnostic testing. Genet Med. 2002, 4 (4): 279-288.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Iossa S, Marciano E, Franze A: GJB2 Gene Mutations in Syndromic Skin Diseases with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Curr Genomics. 2011, 12 (7): 475-785.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Terrinoni A, Codispoti A, Serra V, Didona B, Bruno E, Nistico R, Giustizieri M, Alessandrini M, Campione E, Melino G: Connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations, causing KID Syndrome, are associated with cell death due to calcium gating deregulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 394 (4): 909-914.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    de Zwart-Storm EA, Rosa RF, Martin PE, Foelster-Holst R, Frank J, Bau AE, Zen PR, Graziadio C, Paskulin GA, Kamps MA, et al: Molecular analysis of connexin26 asparagine14 mutations associated with syndromic skin phenotypes. Exp Dermatol. 2011, 20 (5): 408-412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Haack B, Schmalisch K, Palmada M, Bohmer C, Kohlschmidt N, Keilmann A, Zechner U, Limberger A, Beckert S, Zenner HP, et al: Deficient membrane integration of the novel p. N14D-GJB2 mutant associated with non-syndromic hearing impairment. Hum Mutat. 2006, 27 (11): 1158-1159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Choi SY, Lee KY, Kim HJ, Kim HK, Chang Q, Park HJ, Jeon CJ, Lin X, Bok J, Kim UK: Functional evaluation of GJB2 variants in nonsyndromic hearing loss. Mol Med. 2011, 17 (5–6): 550-556.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Mani RS, Ganapathy A, Jalvi R, Srikumari Srisailapathy CR, Malhotra V, Chadha S, Agarwal A, Ramesh A, Rangasayee RR, Anand A: Functional consequences of novel connexin 26 mutations associated with hereditary hearing loss. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG. 2009, 17 (4): 502-509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Martin PE, Coleman SL, Casalotti SO, Forge A, Evans WH: Properties of connexin26 gap junctional proteins derived from mutations associated with non-syndromal heriditary deafness. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8 (13): 2369-2376.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Zhang Y, Tang W, Ahmad S, Sipp JA, Chen P, Lin X: Gap junction-mediated intercellular biochemical coupling in cochlear supporting cells is required for normal cochlear functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (42): 15201-15206.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Palmada M, Schmalisch K, Bohmer C, Schug N, Pfister M, Lang F, Blin N: Loss of function mutations of the GJB2 gene detected in patients with DFNB1-associated hearing impairment. Neurobiol Dis. 2006, 22 (1): 112-118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Skerrett IM, Di WL, Kasperek EM, Kelsell DP, Nicholson BJ: Aberrant gating, but a normal expression pattern, underlies the recessive phenotype of the deafness mutant Connexin26M34T. FASEB J. 2004, 18 (7): 860-862.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    White TW, Deans MR, Kelsell DP, Paul DL: Connexin mutations in deafness. Nature. 1998, 394 (6694): 630-631.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Bruzzone R, Veronesi V, Gomes D, Bicego M, Duval N, Marlin S, Petit C, D'Andrea P, White TW. Loss-of-function and residual channel activity of connexin26 mutations associated with non-syndromic deafness. FEBS Lett. 2003;533(1–3):79–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Kenna MA, Wu BL, Cotanche DA, Korf BR, Rehm HL: Connexin 26 studies in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Arch otolaryngol--head & neck Surg. 2001, 127 (9): 1037-1042.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Kim J, Jung J, Lee MG, Choi JY, Lee KA: Non-syndromic hearing loss caused by the dominant cis mutation R75Q with the recessive mutation V37I of the GJB2 (Connexin 26) gene. Exp Mol Med. 2015, 47: e169

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Sánchez HA, Mese G, Srinivas M, White TW, Verselis VK: Differentially altered Ca2+ regulation and Ca2+ permeability in Cx26 hemichannels formed by the A40V and G45E mutations that cause keratitis ichthyosis deafness syndrome. J Gen Physiol. 2010, 136 (1): 47-62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Sánchez HA, Bienkowski R, Slavi N, Srinivas M, Verselis VK: Altered inhibition of Cx26 hemichannels by pH and Zn2+ in the A40V mutation associated with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. J Biol Chem. 2014, 289 (31): 21519-21532.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Zhang J, Scherer SS, Yum SW: Dominant Cx26 mutants associated with hearing loss have dominant-negative effects on wild type Cx26. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011, 47 (2): 71-78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Yum SW, Zhang J, Scherer SS: Dominant connexin26 mutants associated with human hearing loss have trans-dominant effects on connexin30. Neurobiol Dis. 2010, 38 (2): 226-236.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Marziano NK, Casalotti SO, Portelli AE, Becker DL, Forge A: Mutations in the gene for connexin 26 (GJB2) that cause hearing loss have a dominant negative effect on connexin 30. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12 (8): 805-812.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Bakirtzis G, Choudhry R, Aasen T, Shore L, Brown K, Bryson S, Forrow S, Tetley L, Finbow M, Greenhalgh D, et al: Targeted epidermal expression of mutant Connexin 26(D66H) mimics true Vohwinkel syndrome and provides a model for the pathogenesis of dominant connexin disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12 (14): 1737-1744.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Thomas T, Jordan K, Simek J, Shao Q, Jedeszko C, Walton P, Laird DW: Mechanisms of Cx43 and Cx26 transport to the plasma membrane and gap junction regeneration. J Cell Sci. 2005, 118 (Pt 19): 4451-4462.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Thomas T, Telford D, Laird DW: Functional domain mapping and selective trans-dominant effects exhibited by Cx26 disease-causing mutations. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (18): 19157-19168.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Thomas T, Aasen T, Hodgins M, Laird DW: Transport and function of cx26 mutants involved in skin and deafness disorders. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003, 10 (4–6): 353-358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Rouan F, White TW, Brown N, Taylor AM, Lucke TW, Paul DL, Munro CS, Uitto J, Hodgins MB, Richard G: Trans-dominant inhibition of connexin-43 by mutant connexin-26: implications for dominant connexin disorders affecting epidermal differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114 (Pt 11): 2105-2113.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Choi SY, Park HJ, Lee KY, Dinh EH, Chang Q, Ahmad S, Lee SH, Bok J, Lin X, Kim UK: Different functional consequences of two missense mutations in the GJB2 gene associated with non-syndromic hearing loss. Hum Mutat. 2009, 30 (7): E716-E727.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Bruzzone R, Gomes D, Denoyelle E, Duval N, Perea J, Veronesi V, Weil D, Petit C, Gabellec MM, D'Andrea P, et al. Functional analysis of a dominant mutation of human connexin26 associated with nonsyndromic deafness. Cell Commun Adhes. 2001;8(4–6):425–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Melchionda S, Bicego M, Marciano E, Franze A, Morgutti M, Bortone G, Zelante L, Carella M, D'Andrea P. Functional characterization of a novel Cx26 (T55N) mutation associated to non-syndromic hearing loss. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;337(3):799–805.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Tekin M, Arnos KS, Xia XJ, Oelrich MK, Liu XZ, Nance WE, Pandya A: W44C mutation in the connexin 26 gene associated with dominant non-syndromic deafness. Clin Genet. 2001, 59 (4): 269-273.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Stong BC, Chang Q, Ahmad S, Lin X: A novel mechanism for connexin 26 mutation linked deafness: cell death caused by leaky gap junction hemichannels. Laryngoscope. 2006, 116 (12): 2205-2210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Ogawa Y, Takeichi T, Kono M, Hamajima N, Yamamoto T, Sugiura K, Akiyama M: Revertant mutation releases confined lethal mutation, opening Pandora’s box: a novel genetic pathogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10 (5): e1004276

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Oguchi T, Ohtsuka A, Hashimoto S, Oshima A, Abe S, Kobayashi Y, Nagai K, Matsunaga T, Iwasaki S, Nakagawa T, et al: Clinical features of patients with GJB2 (connexin 26) mutations: severity of hearing loss is correlated with genotypes and protein expression patterns. J Hum Genet. 2005, 50 (2): 76-83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Prasad S, Cucci RA, Green GE, Smith RJ: Genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss: connexin 26 (GJB2) allele variants and two novel deafness-causing mutations (R32C and 645-648delTAGA). Hum Mutat. 2000, 16 (6): 502-508.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Mhaske PV, Levit NA, Li L, Wang HZ, Lee JR, Shuja Z, Brink PR, White TW: The human Cx26-D50A and Cx26-A88V mutations causing keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome display increased hemichannel activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013, 304 (12): C1150-C1158.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Cushing SL, MacDonald L, Propst EJ, Sharma A, Stockley T, Blaser SL, James AL, Papsin BC: Successful cochlear implantation in a child with Keratosis, Icthiosis and Deafness (KID) Syndrome and Dandy-Walker malformation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 72 (5): 693-698.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Lopez W, Gonzalez J, Liu Y, Harris AL, Contreras JE: Insights on the mechanisms of Ca(2+) regulation of connexin26 hemichannels revealed by human pathogenic mutations (D50N/Y). J Gen Physiol. 2013, 142 (1): 23-35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Terrinoni A, Codispoti A, Serra V, Bruno E, Didona B, Paradisi M, Nistico S, Campione E, Napolitano B, Diluvio L, et al: Connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations as a cause of the KID syndrome with hearing loss. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 395 (1): 25-30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Sánchez HA, Villone K, Srinivas M, Verselis VK: The D50N mutation and syndromic deafness: altered Cx26 hemichannel properties caused by effects on the pore and intersubunit interactions. J Gen Physiol. 2013, 142 (1): 3-22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Toth T, Kupka S, Haack B, Riemann K, Braun S, Fazakas F, Zenner HP, Muszbek L, Blin N, Pfister M, et al: GJB2 mutations in patients with non-syndromic hearing loss from Northeastern Hungary. Hum Mutat. 2004, 23 (6): 631-632.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Piazza V, Beltramello M, Menniti M, Colao E, Malatesta P, Argento R, Chiarella G, Gallo LV, Catalano M, Perrotti N, et al: Functional analysis of R75Q mutation in the gene coding for Connexin 26 identified in a family with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Clin Genet. 2005, 68 (2): 161-166.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Bajaj Y, Sirimanna T, Albert DM, Qadir P, Jenkins L, Bitner-Glindzicz M: Spectrum of GJB2 mutations causing deafness in the British Bangladeshi population. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008, 33 (4): 313-318.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Carrasquillo MM, Zlotogora J, Barges S, Chakravarti A: Two different connexin 26 mutations in an inbred kindred segregating non–syndromic recessive deafness: implications for genetic studies in isolated populations. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6 (12): 2163-2172.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kupka S, Braun S, Aberle S, Haack B, Ebauer M, Zeissler U, Zenner HP, Blin N, Pfister M: Frequencies of GJB2 mutations in German control individuals and patients showing sporadic non–syndromic hearing impairment. Hum Mutat. 2002, 20 (1): 77-78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Wang HL, Chang WT, Li AH, Yeh TH, Wu CY, Chen MS, Huang PC: Functional analysis of connexin–26 mutants associated with hereditary recessive deafness. J Neurochem. 2003, 84 (4): 735-742.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Ambrosi C, Boassa D, Pranskevich J, Smock A, Oshima A, Xu J, Nicholson BJ, Sosinsky GE: Analysis of four connexin26 mutant gap junctions and hemichannels reveals variations in hexamer stability. Biophys J. 2010, 98 (9): 1809-1819.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Cryns K, Orzan E, Murgia A, Huygen PL, Moreno F, del Castillo I, Chamberlin GP, Azaiez H, Prasad S, Cucci RA, et al: A genotype–phenotype correlation for GJB2 (connexin 26) deafness. J Med Genet. 2004, 41 (3): 147-154.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Meigh L, Hussain N, Mulkey DK, Dale N: Connexin26 hemichannels with a mutation that causes KID syndrome in humans lack sensitivity to CO2. Elife. 2014, 3: e04249

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Posukh O, Pallares–Ruiz N, Tadinova V, Osipova L, Claustres M, Roux AF: First molecular screening of deafness in the Altai Republic population. BMC Med Genet. 2005, 6: 12

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Loffler J, Nekahm D, Hirst-Stadlmann A, Gunther B, Menzel HJ, Utermann G, Janecke AR. Sensorineural hearing loss and the incidence of Cx26 mutations in Austria. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(3):226–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Marlin S, Garabedian EN, Roger G, Moatti L, Matha N, Lewin P, Petit C, Denoyelle F: Connexin 26 gene mutations in congenitally deaf children: pitfalls for genetic counseling. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001, 127 (8): 927-933.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Man YK, Trolove C, Tattersall D, Thomas AC, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Patel D, et al. A deafness–associated mutant human connexin 26 improves the epithelial barrier in vitro. J Membr Biol. 2007;218(1–3):29–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Brobby GW, Muller–Myhsok B, Horstmann RD: Connexin 26 R143W mutation associated with recessive nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness in Africa. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338 (8): 548-550.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Xiao Z, Yang Z, Liu X, Xie D: Impaired membrane targeting and aberrant cellular localization of human Cx26 mutants associated with inherited recessive hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011, 131 (1): 59-66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Rickard S, Kelsell DP, Sirimana T, Rajput K, MacArdle B, Bitner–Glindzicz M: Recurrent mutations in the deafness gene GJB2 (connexin 26) in British Asian families. J Med Genet. 2001, 38 (8): 530-533.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Denoyelle F, Weil D, Maw MA, Wilcox SA, Lench NJ, Allen-Powell DR, Osborn AH, Dahl HH, Middleton A, Houseman MJ, et al. Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(12):2173–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Hamelmann C, Amedofu GK, Albrecht K, Muntau B, Gelhaus A, Brobby GW, Horstmann RD: Pattern of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations causing sensorineural hearing impairment in Ghana. Hum Mutat. 2001, 18 (1): 84-85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Matos TD, Caria H, Simoes-Teixeira H, Aasen T, Dias O, Andrea M, Kelsell DP, Fialho G. A novel M163L mutation in connexin 26 causing cell death and associated with autosomal dominant hearing loss. Hear Res. 2008;240(1–2):87–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    de Zwart–Storm EA, van Geel M, van Neer PA, Steijlen PM, Martin PE, van Steensel MA: A novel missense mutation in the second extracellular domain of GJB2, p. Ser183Phe, causes a syndrome of focal palmoplantar keratoderma with deafness. Am J Pathol. 2008, 173 (4): 1113-1119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Ambrosi C, Walker AE, Depriest AD, Cone AC, Lu C, Badger J, Skerrett IM, Sosinsky GE: Analysis of trafficking, stability and function of human connexin 26 gap junction channels with deafness–causing mutations in the fourth transmembrane helix. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (8): e70916

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Mese G, Valiunas V, Brink PR, White TW: Connexin26 deafness associated mutations show altered permeability to large cationic molecules. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008, 295 (4): C966-C974.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Morle L, Bozon M, Alloisio N, Latour P, Vandenberghe A, Plauchu H, Collet L, Edery P, Godet J, Lina-Granade G. A novel C202F mutation in the connexin26 gene (GJB2) associated with autosomal dominant isolated hearing loss. J Med Genet. 2000;37(5):368–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Yilmaz A, Menevse S, Bayazit Y, Karamert R, Ergin V, Menevse A: Two novel missense mutations in the connexin 26 gene in Turkish patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Biochem Genet. 2010, 48 (3–4): 248-256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Deschenes SM, Walcott JL, Wexler TL, Scherer SS, Fischbeck KH: Altered trafficking of mutant connexin32. J neurosci: J Soc Neurosci. 1997, 17 (23): 9077-9084.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Ionasescu V, Ionasescu R, Searby C: Correlation between connexin 32 gene mutations and clinical phenotype in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Am J Med Genet. 1996, 63 (3): 486-491.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H: Sex-linked recessive inheritance in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease with partial clinical manifestations in female carriers. Hum Genet. 1980, 55 (3): 413-415.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Gutierrez A, England JD, Sumner AJ, Ferer S, Warner LE, Lupski JR, Garcia CA: Unusual electrophysiological findings in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Muscle Nerve. 2000, 23 (2): 182-188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Senderek J, Hermanns B, Bergmann C, Boroojerdi B, Bajbouj M, Hungs M, Ramaekers VT, Quasthoff S, Karch D, Schroder JM: X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy: clinical, electrophysiological, and morphological phenotype in four families with different connexin32 mutations(1). J Neurol Sci. 1999, 167 (2): 90-101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Martin PE, Mambetisaeva ET, Archer DA, George CH, Evans WH: Analysis of gap junction assembly using mutated connexins detected in Charcot-Marie-Tooth X-linked disease. J Neurochem. 2000, 74 (2): 711-720.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Wang HL, Chang WT, Yeh TH, Wu T, Chen MS, Wu CY: Functional analysis of connexin-32 mutants associated with X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2004, 15 (2): 361-370.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Kleopa KA, Yum SW, Scherer SS: Cellular mechanisms of connexin32 mutations associated with CNS manifestations. J Neurosci Res. 2002, 68 (5): 522-534.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Yum SW, Kleopa KA, Shumas S, Scherer SS: Diverse trafficking abnormalities of connexin32 mutants causing CMTX. Neurobiol Dis. 2002, 11 (1): 43-52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Dubourg O, Tardieu S, Birouk N, Gouider R, Leger JM, Maisonobe T, Brice A, Bouche P, LeGuern E: Clinical, electrophysiological and molecular genetic characteristics of 93 patients with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain. 2001, 124 (Pt 10): 1958-1967.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Zhang Y, Hao H: Conserved glycine at position 45 of major cochlear connexins constitutes a vital component of the Ca(2)(+) sensor for gating of gap junction hemichannels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013, 436 (3): 424-429.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Yoshimura T, Satake M, Ohnishi A, Tsutsumi Y, Fujikura Y: Mutations of connexin32 in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type X interfere with cell-to-cell communication but not cell proliferation and myelin-specific gene expression. J Neurosci Res. 1998, 51 (2): 154-161.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Omori Y, Mesnil M, Yamasaki H: Connexin 32 mutations from X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease patients: functional defects and dominant negative effects. Mol Biol Cell. 1996, 7 (6): 907-916.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Abrams CK, Islam M, Mahmoud R, Kwon T, Bargiello TA, Freidin MM: Functional requirement for a highly conserved charged residue at position 75 in the gap junction protein connexin 32. J Biol Chem. 2013, 288 (5): 3609-3619.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Janssen EA, Kemp S, Hensels GW, Sie OG, de Die-Smulders CE, Hoogendijk JE, et al. Connexin32 gene mutations in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMTX1). Hum Genet. 1997;99(4):501–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Ri Y, Ballesteros JA, Abrams CK, Oh S, Verselis VK, Weinstein H, Bargiello TA: The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. Biophys J. 1999, 76 (6): 2887-2898.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Abrams CK, Freidin M, Bukauskas F, Dobrenis K, Bargiello TA, Verselis VK, Bennett MV, Chen L, Sahenk Z: Pathogenesis of X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: differential effects of two mutations in connexin 32. J neurosci: j Soc Neurosci. 2003, 23 (33): 10548-10558.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Stauch K, Kieken F, Sorgen P: Characterization of the structure and intermolecular interactions between the connexin 32 carboxyl-terminal domain and the protein partners synapse-associated protein 97 and calmodulin. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287 (33): 27771-27788.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Jeng LJ, Balice-Gordon RJ, Messing A, Fischbeck KH, Scherer SS: The effects of a dominant connexin32 mutant in myelinating Schwann cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2006, 32 (3): 283-298.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    VanSlyke JK, Deschenes SM, Musil LS: Intracellular transport, assembly, and degradation of wild-type and disease-linked mutant gap junction proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11 (6): 1933-1946.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Fairweather N, Bell C, Cochrane S, Chelly J, Wang S, Mostacciuolo ML, Monaco AP, Haites NE: Mutations in the connexin 32 gene in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMTX1). Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3 (1): 29-34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Kleopa KA, Zamba-Papanicolaou E, Alevra X, Nicolaou P, Georgiou DM, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriakides T, Christodoulou K: Phenotypic and cellular expression of two novel connexin32 mutations causing CMT1X. Neurology. 2006, 66 (3): 396-402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Bruzzone R, White TW, Scherer SS, Fischbeck KH, Paul DL: Null mutations of connexin32 in patients with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuron. 1994, 13 (5): 1253-1260.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Castro C, Gomez-Hernandez JM, Silander K, Barrio LC: Altered formation of hemichannels and gap junction channels caused by C-terminal connexin-32 mutations. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (10): 3752-3760.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Barrio LC, Castro C, Gomez-Hernandez JM: Altered assembly of gap junction channels caused by COOH-terminal connexin32 mutants of CMTX. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999, 883: 526-529.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Hahn AF, Brown WF, Koopman WJ, Feasby TE: X-linked dominant hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Brain. 1990, 113 (Pt 5): 1511-1525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Shao Q, Liu Q, Lorentz R, Gong XQ, Bai D, Shaw GS, Laird DW: Structure and functional studies of N-terminal Cx43 mutants linked to oculodentodigital dysplasia. Mol Biol Cell. 2012, 23 (17): 3312-3321.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    de la Parra DR, Zenteno JC: A new GJA1 (connexin 43) mutation causing oculodentodigital dysplasia associated to uncommon features. Ophthalmic Genet. 2007, 28 (4): 198-202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Kelly SC, Ratajczak P, Keller M, Purcell SM, Griffin T, Richard G: A novel GJA 1 mutation in oculo-dento-digital dysplasia with curly hair and hyperkeratosis. Eur J Dermatol. 2006, 16 (3): 241-245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Shibayama J, Paznekas W, Seki A, Taffet S, Jabs EW, Delmar M, Musa H: Functional characterization of connexin43 mutations found in patients with oculodentodigital dysplasia. Circ Res. 2005, 96 (10): e83-e91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Lai A, Le DN, Paznekas WA, Gifford WD, Jabs EW, Charles AC: Oculodentodigital dysplasia connexin43 mutations result in non-functional connexin hemichannels and gap junctions in C6 glioma cells. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119 (Pt 3): 532-541.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Paznekas WA, Karczeski B, Vermeer S, Lowry RB, Delatycki M, Laurence F, Koivisto PA, Van Maldergem L, Boyadjiev SA, Bodurtha JN, et al: GJA1 mutations, variants, and connexin 43 dysfunction as it relates to the oculodentodigital dysplasia phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2009, 30 (5): 724-733.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Richardson R, Donnai D, Meire F, Dixon MJ: Expression of Gja1 correlates with the phenotype observed in oculodentodigital syndrome/type III syndactyly. J Med Genet. 2004, 41 (1): 60-67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Huang T, Shao Q, MacDonald A, Xin L, Lorentz R, Bai D, Laird DW: Autosomal recessive GJA1 (Cx43) gene mutations cause oculodentodigital dysplasia by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Sci. 2013, 126 (Pt 13): 2857-2866.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    McLachlan E, Manias JL, Gong XQ, Lounsbury CS, Shao Q, Bernier SM, Bai D, Laird DW: Functional characterization of oculodentodigital dysplasia-associated Cx43 mutants. Cell Commun Adhes. 2005, 12 (5–6): 279-292.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Van Norstrand DW, Asimaki A, Rubinos C, Dolmatova E, Srinivas M, Tester DJ, Saffitz JE, Duffy HS, Ackerman MJ: Connexin43 mutation causes heterogeneous gap junction loss and sudden infant death. Circulation. 2012, 125 (3): 474-481.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Van Norstrand DW, Asimaki A, Rubinos C, Dolmatova E, Srinivas M, Tester DJ, Saffitz JE, Duffy HS, Ackerman MJ. The connexin 40 A96S mutation causes renin-dependent hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(6):1031–40.

    Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Kalcheva N, Qu J, Sandeep N, Garcia L, Zhang J, Wang Z, Lampe PD, Suadicani SO, Spray DC, Fishman GI: Gap junction remodeling and cardiac arrhythmogenesis in a murine model of oculodentodigital dysplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (51): 20512-20516.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Hong HM, Yang JJ, Shieh JC, Lin ML, Li SY: Novel mutations in the connexin43 (GJA1) and GJA1 pseudogene may contribute to nonsyndromic hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2010, 127 (5): 545-551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Pizzuti A, Flex E, Mingarelli R, Salpietro C, Zelante L, Dallapiccola B: A homozygous GJA1 gene mutation causes a Hallermann-Streiff/ODDD spectrum phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2004, 23 (3): 286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Beahm DL, Oshima A, Gaietta GM, Hand GM, Smock AE, Zucker SN, Toloue MM, Chandrasekhar A, Nicholson BJ, Sosinsky GE: Mutation of a conserved threonine in the third transmembrane helix of alpha- and beta-connexins creates a dominant-negative closed gap junction channel. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (12): 7994-8009.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Zucker SN, Bancroft TA, Place DE, Des Soye B, Bagati A, Berezney R: A dominant negative Cx43 mutant differentially affects tumorigenic and invasive properties in human metastatic melanoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2013, 228 (4): 853-859.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    van Es RJ, Wittebol-Post D, Beemer FA: Oculodentodigital dysplasia with mandibular retrognathism and absence of syndactyly: a case report with a novel mutation in the connexin 43 gene. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007, 36 (9): 858-860.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    Gong XQ, Shao Q, Lounsbury CS, Bai D, Laird DW: Functional characterization of a GJA1 frameshift mutation causing oculodentodigital dysplasia and palmoplantar keratoderma. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (42): 31801-31811.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Dasgupta C, Martinez AM, Zuppan CW, Shah MM, Bailey LL, Fletcher WH: Identification of connexin43 (alpha1) gap junction gene mutations in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Mutat Res. 2001, 479 (1–2): 173-186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Thomas BC, Minogue PJ, Valiunas V, Kanaporis G, Brink PR, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC: Cataracts are caused by alterations of a critical N-terminal positive charge in connexin50. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008, 49 (6): 2549-2556.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Zhu Y, Yu H, Wang W, Gong X, Yao K: Correction: A Novel GJA8 Mutation (p.V44A) Causing Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract. PLoS One. 2015, 10: e0125949

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Vanita V, Singh JR, Singh D, Varon R, Sperling K: A novel mutation in GJA8 associated with jellyfish-like cataract in a family of Indian origin. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 323-326.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Berry V, Mackay D, Khaliq S, Francis PJ, Hameed A, Anwar K, Mehdi SQ, Newbold RJ, Ionides A, Shiels A, et al: Connexin 50 mutation in a family with congenital “zonular nuclear” pulverulent cataract of Pakistani origin. Hum Genet. 1999, 105 (1–2): 168-170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Pal JD, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC, Mackay D, Shiels A, Ebihara L: Molecular mechanism underlying a Cx50-linked congenital cataract. Am J Phys. 1999, 276 (6 Pt 1): C1443-C1446.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    Arora A, Minogue PJ, Liu X, Reddy MA, Ainsworth JR, Bhattacharya SS, Webster AR, Hunt DM, Ebihara L, Moore AT, et al: A novel GJA8 mutation is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar pulverulent cataract: further evidence for gap junction dysfunction in human cataract. J Med Genet. 2006, 43 (1): e2

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  248. 248.

    Liu Y, Qiao C, Wei T, Zheng F, Guo S, Chen Q, et al. Mutant connexin 50 (S276F) inhibits channel and hemichannel functions inducing cataract. J Genet. 2015;94(2):221–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. 249.

    Yan M, Xiong C, Ye SQ, Chen Y, Ke M, Zheng F, Zhou X: A novel connexin 50 (GJA8) mutation in a Chinese family with a dominant congenital pulverulent nuclear cataract. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 418-424.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Minogue PJ, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM: A connexin50 mutant, CX50fs, that causes cataracts is unstable, but is rescued by a proteasomal inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2013, 288 (28): 20427-20434.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Anillo #ACT 1104 (to ADM, CG and MAR), Fondecyt #1130855 (to ADM) and #1120214 (to MAR), and Fondecyt Postdoctoral #3150634 (to IEG) and #3150442 (to PP). The Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencias de Valparaíso is a Chilean Millennium Institute (P09-022-F).

Declarations

Publication charge for this article was funded by grant Fondecyt #1130855 (to ADM).

This article has been published as part of BMC Cell Biology Volume 17 Supplement 1, 2016: Proceedings of the International Gap Junction Conference 2015. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://bmccellbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-17-supplement-1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agustín D. Martínez.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ADM, conceived the original idea. IEG, PP, and ADM co-wrote and co-edited the final version of the manuscript. AP, made the molecular models of Cxs subunits; OJ, PM, DRG, CFM, JGC, CSR, BIP, MAR and CG, co-designed and co-wrote the tables and contributed to the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Isaac E. García, Pavel Prado, Amaury Pupo contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, I.E., Prado, P., Pupo, A. et al. Connexinopathies: a structural and functional glimpse. BMC Cell Biol 17, S17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-016-0092-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Connexins
  • hemichannels
  • gap junction channels
  • structure and function
  • human genetic disease