- Research article
- Open Access
Multiple mesodermal lineage differentiation of Apodemus sylvaticus embryonic stem cells in vitro
- Tao Wang†1, 2,
- Frank Fuxiang Mao†1, 2,
- Wenyu Lai3,
- Weiqiang Li1, 2,
- Weihua Yu1, 2,
- Zifei Wang1, 2,
- Lirong Zhang5,
- Jinli Zhang1,
- Jin Niu6,
- Xiuming Zhang1, 2,
- Bruce T Lahn1, 2 and
- Andy Peng Xiang1, 2, 4Email author
© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 25 July 2009
- Accepted: 19 June 2010
- Published: 19 June 2010
Embryonic stem (ES) cells have attracted significant attention from researchers around the world because of their ability to undergo indefinite self-renewal and produce derivatives from the three cell lineages, which has enormous value in research and clinical applications. Until now, many ES cell lines of different mammals have been established and studied. In addition, recently, AS-ES1 cells derived from Apodemus sylvaticus were established and identified by our laboratory as a new mammalian ES cell line. Hence further research, in the application of AS-ES1 cells, is warranted.
Herein we report the generation of multiple mesodermal AS-ES1 lineages via embryoid body (EB) formation by the hanging drop method and the addition of particular reagents and factors for induction at the stage of EB attachment. The AS-ES1 cells generated separately in vitro included: adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes and cardiomyocytes. Histochemical staining, immunofluorescent staining and RT-PCR were carried out to confirm the formation of multiple mesodermal lineage cells.
The appropriate reagents and culture milieu used in mesodermal differentiation of mouse ES cells also guide the differentiation of in vitro AS-ES1 cells into distinct mesoderm-derived cells. This study provides a better understanding of the characteristics of AS-ES1 cells, a new species ES cell line and promotes the use of Apodemus ES cells as a complement to mouse ES cells in future studies.
- Embryonic Stem Cell
- Retinoic Acid
- Embryoid Body
- Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell
- Embryonic Stem Cell Line
Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cells derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage embryos . The abilities of ES cells to undergo indefinite self-renewal in vitro and to produce derivative lineages of all three embryonic germ layers in vitro and in vivo make them highly prized in both clinical and research settings . ES, or ES-like, cells have thus far been derived from a number of mammalian species, including the mouse , rat , bovine , sheep , pig , rhesus macaque , crab-eating macaque , marmoset  and human .
Apodemus sylvaticus is a common rodent species found throughout Europe. A. sylvaticus has a gross appearance similar to that of the laboratory mouse. The rearing conditions are also quite similar to those of the mouse. However, the superficial resemblance between A. sylvaticus and the laboratory mouse belies the rather deep evolutionary divide separating these two species. The combination of these properties--that is, the similar rearing conditions and large evolutionary divergence--makes A. sylvaticus highly attractive as a potential model organism that could perhaps complement the mouse in many studies. Unlike the mouse, however, there is a dearth of knowledge and reagents related to A. sylvaticus. One major step in filling this gap is the generation of ES cells for this species. Recently, we reported the successful establishment of an ES cell line from A. sylvaticus , named AS-ES1 cells. This cell line has proliferated continuously for over 6 months with a normal karyotype. It expresses a variety of markers associated with the undifferentiated state and has the ability to produce lineages of all three germ layers in vitro and in vivo. However, there are some characteristic differences between AS-ES1 and mouse ES cells. For example, AS-ES1 cells do not express stage specific embryonic antigen-1 (SSEA-1), whereas mouse ES cells do. Furthermore, the AS-ES1 cell line proliferates faster than specific mouse ES cell lines. Therefore, as a new species of ES cell line, the basic characteristics of AS-ES1 cells need to be studied further, including specific lineage differentiation.
Mouse ES cells were first established in 1981. Since then, many studies have been carried out regarding the three lineages differentiation of mouse ES cells in vitro. For mesodermal differentiation of mouse ES cells in vitro, different research groups have generated a variety of cell types, such as adipocytes [13, 14], osteoblasts [15–19], chondrocytes [20–22] and cardiomyocytes [23, 24], among others. Through this research, some pivotal agents that play an important role in the process of mesodermal differentiation of mouse ES cells have been discovered. However, it was not known whether those agents and differentiation methods could work with AS-ES1 cells.
Herein we report that AS-ES1 cells treated with retinoic acid (RA) or 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) at the embryoid body (EB) stage, with the addition of various specific factors and reagents to the medium during EB attachment, generated multiple mesodermal lineages in vitro, including adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes and cardiomyocytes.
AS-ES1 cells maintained their undifferentiated state and generated embryoid bodies (EBs) in vitro
AS-ES1 cells were capable of in vitro adipogenesis, osteogenesis and chondrogenesis
The percentage of positive cells stained by oil red O, alizarin red, toluidine blue or anti-collagen IIantibody differed. The proportion of positive cells in chondrogenesis was the greatest (toluidine blue, 20.69 ± 1.16%; anti-collagen IIantibody, 30.46 ± 1.87%), whereas the proportion of positive cells in adipogenesis (8.98 ± 0.89%) was similar to that in osteogenesis (9.05 ± 0.88%).
Expression of specific genes for adipogenesis, osteogenesis and chondrogenesis was investigated by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) (Fig. 2B). We analyzed expression levels for genes including the adipocyte lipid binding protein (ALBP), peroxisome proliferative-activated receptor γ2 (PPARγ2), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα), Runx2, Osteopontin, Sox9 and Col2a1. RT-PCR of β-actin and undifferentiated AS-ES1 cells were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Generation of cardiomyocytes by AS-ES1 cells
Additional file 1: Movie for the beating cells. At 21 days after plating, under cardiomyocyte differentiation conditions, beating cells in EB outgrowths were photographed by Olympus phase-contrast microscope. (MPG 306 KB)
In our previous research, AS-ES1 cells spontaneously differentiated into cells of three germ lineages in vitro and produced healthy chimeras bearing extensive contributions in all major organs . As a new ES cell line, AS-ES1 cells require more experimentation to discover their features. In this paper, we focused on the formation of specific mesodermal cells, derived from AS-ES1 cells, cultured with various factors and reagents in vitro, including dexamethasone, β-glycerophosphate, ascorbic acid, insulin and transforming growth factor (TGF) β1.
First, we treated EBs of AS-ES1 cells with RA for 3 days, which was previously reported to induce the development of mesenchymal cell lineages from mouse ES cells [13, 25]. The distinctive effect of RA on ES cell differentiation is uncertain. It was reported that RA enhances neural crest generation, a major source of mesenchymal elements in RA-treated EBs, but not mesoderm development directly, to drive the formation of mesodermal type cells . However, RA suppresses cardiomyocyte formation [13, 25]. Thus, 5-AZA, which has previously been employed for the formation of cardiomyocytes derived from ES cells [24, 26], was used to replace RA for cardiomyocyte differentiation in this study.
After EB formation, during the EB attachment stage, various factors and reagents, such as dexamethasone, β-glycerophosphate and TGFβ1, have been used to enhance differentiation. These factors and reagents were important elements for mesoderm differentiation of mouse ES cells into adipocytes, osteoblasts or other types of mesodermal cells [13, 15–18]. In our experiment, we obtained four types of mesodermal cells separately by applying similar factors and reagents. With cardiomyocyte differentiation, we preferred a simple compound, ascorbic acid, rather than 5-AZA, because of 5-AZA cytotoxicity. The Takahashi group  screened a broad range of compounds and determined that ascorbic acid markedly increased the efficiency of cardiac differentiation from mouse ES cells. In addition, Sato's group  demonstrated that ascorbic acid enhanced the differentiation of ES cells into cardiomyocytes through collagen synthesis. From quantitative data, we could estimate that the yield of the four cell types--adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes and cardiomyocytes--was 10-30% of the total cell number. The proportions were similar to those of the four cell types derived from mouse ES cells .
This study demonstrated that AS-ES1 cells could be induced to differentiate into mesodermal lineages by a combination of growth factors and chemicals and provides more information to further understand the differentiation characteristics of AS-ES1 cells.
AS-ES1 Cell Culture
AS-ES1 cells were cultured on MEF cells mitotically inactivated by 55-gray γ-irradiation, as previously described . The ES cell medium contained high-glucose DMEM (Hyclone Laboratories Inc., Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 103 units/ml recombinant murine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula CA, USA), 0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol (Sigma, St. Louis MO, USA), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island NY, USA), 1× nonessential amino acids (Sigma) and 1× penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco/Invitrogen). The AS-ES1 cells were kept at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and were passaged every 2-3 days.
Embryoid Body (EB) Formation and Differentiation Media
AS-ES1 cells were dissociated with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA (Gibco/Invitrogen) and resuspended in EB medium. This medium consisted of high-glucose DMEM, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1× nonessential amino acids and 1× penicillin/streptomycin. Hanging drops containing 4-5 × 103 cells in 20 μl of EB medium were maintained for 2 days on the lid of bacteriological dishes filled with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The EBs were then transferred into bacteriological dishes and maintained for 3 days in suspension in EB medium supplemented with either 10-7 M all-trans retinoic acid (RA, Sigma) [13, 18] for adipo-, osteo- and chondrogenesis, or 10-6 M 5-azacytidine (5-AZA, Sigma)  for cardiomyocyte generation. The medium was changed daily. EBs were maintained for 2 more days in suspension in EB medium and were then allowed to settle onto 2% gelatin-coated plates in the presence of various differentiation media. The differentiation media contained high-glucose DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum and 1× penicillin/streptomycin supplemented with the following reagents: 1 μm/L dexamethasone, 0.2 mM indomethacin, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) and 10 μg/ml insulin for adipogenesis [14, 28]; 0.1 μm/L dexamethasone, 0.2 mM ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate for osteogenesis [15, 17]; 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 and fetal bovine serum reduced to 3% for chondrogenesis [18, 29]; and 0.4 mM ascorbic acid for cardiomyocyte formation . TGFβ1 was purchased from PeproTech EC (London, UK) and the other reagents were obtained from Sigma. All of the differentiation media were changed every three days.
The day of EB initial formation represented day 0. EB outgrowths induced for 28 days were fixed by 10% neutral formaldehyde for 20 min, washed with dH2O and then processed as follows for the different stains. The results of the histochemical staining were investigated under an inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Oil Red O staining: samples were incubated with 2% oil red O (Sigma) in 60% iso-propyl alcohol for 40 min. To avoid non-specific staining, the samples were incubated with 60% iso-propyl alcohol for 2 min and washed with dH2O four times.
Alizarin Red staining: specimens were incubated with 40 mM alizarin red (Sigma) in dH2O for 20 min and washed with dH2O four times.
Toluidine Blue staining: specimens were incubated with 1% toluidine blue (Sigma) for 2 h, washed with 95% ethanol one time and rinsed in dH2O four times.
Immunofluorescence Staining for Cells
EB outgrowth cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min and blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 h. The cells were first incubated with primary antibodies against desmin (Neomarkers, Fremont CA, USA, 200× dilution), sarcomeric α-actinin (Sigma, 400× dilution), cardiac myosin heavy chain (Chemicon, 100× dilution), cardiac troponin I (Chemicon, 100× dilution) or collagen II (Rockland Inc., Gilbertsville PA, USA, 200× dilution) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or goat anti-rabbit IgG (Southern Biotech, Birmingham AL, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The specimens were mounted in a vectashield with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus).
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Assay
Total RNA from EB outgrowths was extracted using TRIzol (Gibco/Invitrogen). The first strand complementary DNA was synthesized using Sensiscript Reverse Transcriptase (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) followed by PCR amplification. The primer sequences and PCR product sizes were: β-actin (F-AGAAGATCTGGCACCACACC, R-TACGACCAGAGGCATACAGG; 198 bp), ALBP (F-TTGGTCACCATCCGGTCAGA, R-TTCCACCACCAGCTTGTCAC; 207 bp), PPARγ2 (F-ATCATCTACACGATGCTGGCC, R-CTCCCTGGTCATGAATCCTTG; 80 bp), C/EBPα (F-CGCAAGAGCCGAGATAAAGC, R-GCGGTCATTGTCACTGGTCA; 80 bp), Runx2 (F-CCTGAACTCTGCACCAAGTC, R-GAGGTCGCAGTGTCATCATC; 234 bp), Osteopontin (F-TCTCCTTGCGCCACAGAATG, R-TCCTTAGACTCACCGCTCTT; 398 bp), Sox9 (F-GCAGACCAGTACCCGCATCT, R-CTCGCTCTCGTTCAGCAGC; 80 bp), Col2a1 (F-CCGTCATCGAGTACCGATCA, R-CAGGTCAGGTCAGCCATTCA; 228 bp), GATA-4 (F-CTGTCATCTCACTCTGGGCA, R-CCAAGTCCGAGCAGGAATTT; 256 bp), β-MHC (F-ACCCCTACGATTATGCG, R-GTGACGTACTCGTTGCC; 319 bp). The amplification fragments were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel. Imaging and scanning densitometry quantification were performed on a Kodak image station 2000R (Kodak, Rochester NY, USA).
Positive cell staining counts and statistical analyses
All experiments of adipogenesis, osteogenesis, chondrogenesis and cardiomyocyte formation were performed at least three times. Data for percentage of positive cells were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by Student's t test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
We thank Professor Shunong Li for helpful advice. This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (2008CB517406), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30971675, 30928015), Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Guangdong Province (2007A032100003) and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-08) to APX.
- Familari M, Selwood L: The potential for derivation of embryonic stem cells in vertebrates. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73: 123-31. 10.1002/mrd.20376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller G: Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 1129-55. 10.1101/gad.1303605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans MJ, Kaufman MH: Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981, 292: 154-6. 10.1038/292154a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vassilieva S, Guan K, Pich U, Wobus AM: Establishment of SSEA-1- and Oct-4-expressing rat embryonic stem-like cell lines and effects of cytokines of the IL-6 family on clonal growth. Exp Cell Res. 2000, 258: 361-73. 10.1006/excr.2000.4940.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stice SL, Strechenko NS, Keefer CL, Matthews L: Pluripotent bovine embryonic cell lines direct embryonic development following nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod. 1996, 54: 100-10. 10.1095/biolreprod54.1.100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Notarianni E, Galli C, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ: Derivation of pluripotent, embryonic cell lines from the pig and sheep. J Reprod Fertil. 1991, 43: 255-60.Google Scholar
- Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ: Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil. 1990, 41: 51-6.Google Scholar
- Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, Duming M, Harris CP, Becker RA, Heam JP: Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 7844-8. 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7844.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suemori H, Tada T, Torii R, Hosoi Y, Kobayashi K, Imahie H, Kondo Y, Iritani A, Nakatsuji N: Establishment of embryonic stem cell lines from cynomolgus monkey blastocysts produced by IVF or ICSI. Dev Dyn. 2001, 222: 273-9. 10.1002/dvdy.1191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, Duming M, Harris CP, Heam JP: Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 1996, 55: 254-9. 10.1095/biolreprod55.2.254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998, 282: 1145-7. 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiang AP, Mao FF, Li WQ, Park D, Ma BF, Wang T, Vallender TW, Vallender EJ, Zhang L, Lee J, Waters JA, Zhang XM, Yu XB, Li SN, Lahn BT: Extensive contribution of embryonic stem cells to the development of an evolutionarily divergent host. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 27-37. 10.1093/hmg/ddm282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dani C, Smith AG, Dessolin S, Leroy P, Staccini L, Villageois P, Danimont C, Aihaud G: Differentiation of embryonic stem cells into adipocytes in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1997, 110: 1279-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips BW, Vernochet C, Dani C: Differentiation of embryonic stem cells for pharmacological studies on adipose cells. Pharmacol Res. 2003, 47: 263-268. 10.1016/S1043-6618(03)00035-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buttery LD, Bourne S, Xynos JD, Wood H, Hughes FJ, Hughes SP, Episkopou V, Polak JM: Differentiation of Osteoblasts and in Vitro Bone Formation from Murine Embryonic Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7: 89-99. 10.1089/107632700300003323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips BW, Belmonte N, Vernochet C, Aihaud G, Dani C: Compactin Enhances Osteogenesis in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 284: 478-484. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4987.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- zur Nieden NI, Kempka G, Ahr HJ: In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells into mineralized osteoblasts. Differentiation. 2003, 71: 18-27. 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.700602.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawaguchi J, Mee PJ, Smith AG: Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells in response to specific growth factors. Bone. 2005, 36: 758-69. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.07.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duplomb L, Dagouassat M, Jourdon P, Heymann D: Differentiation of osteoblasts from mouse embryonic stem cells without generation of embryoid body. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2007, 43: 21-24. 10.1007/s11626-006-9010-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakayama N, Duryea D, Manoukian R, Chow G, Han CY: Macroscopic cartilage formation with embryonic stem cell derived mesodermal progenitor cells. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116: 2015-2028. 10.1242/jcs.00417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- zur Nieden NI, Kempka G, Rancourt DE, Ahr HJ: Induction of chondro-, osteo- and adipogenesis in embryonic stem cells by bone morphogenetic protein-2: Effect of cofactors on differentiating lineages. BMC Dev Biol. 2005, 5: 1-10.1186/1471-213X-5-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang YS, Polak JM, Mantalaris A: In Vitro Direct Chondrogenesis of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells by Bypassing Embryoid Body Formation. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 971-978. 10.1089/scd.2007.0229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi T, Lord B, Schulze PC, Fryer RM, Sarang SS, gullans SR, Lee RT: Ascorbic acid enhances differentiation of embryonic stem cells into cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 2003, 107: 1912-6. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000064899.53876.A3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SC, Yoon J, Shim WJ, Ro YM, Lim DS: 5-azacytidine induces cardiac differentiation of P19 embryonic stem cells. Exp Mol Med. 2004, 36: 515-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dani C: Embryonic stem cell-derived adipogenesis. Cells Tissue Org. 1999, 165: 173-80. 10.1159/000016697.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoon BS, Yoo SJ, Lee JE, You S, Lee HT, Yoon HS: Enhanced differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes by combining hanging drop culture and 5-azacytidine treatment. Differentiation. 2006, 74: 149-59. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00063.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato H, Takahashi M, Ise H, Yamada A, Hirose S, Tagawa Y, Morimoto H, Izawa A, Ikeda U: Collagen synthesis is required for ascorbic acid-enhanced differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 342: 107-12. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS: Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol Rev. 1998, 78: 783-809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hegert C, Kramer J, Hargus G, Müller J, Guan K, Wobus AM, Müller PK, Rohwedel J: Differentiation plasticity of chondrocytes derived from mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 4617-28. 10.1242/jcs.00171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.