Skip to main content
Download PDF

CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting mir-495-3p transcription to control melanoma progression

The role of the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis in melanoma progression

BMC Molecular and Cell Biology volume 23, Article number: 57 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Melanoma is a common type of skin cancer, and its incidence is increasing gradually. Exploring melanoma pathogenesis helps to find new treatments.

Objective

We aimed to explore the potential molecular mechanisms by which CREB1 regulates melanoma.

Methods

TransmiR and ALGGEN were used to predict targets of CREB1 in the promoter of miR-495-3p or miR-495-3p and KPNA2, and a dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed to detect binding of CREB1 to these promoters. In addition, binding of CREB1 to the miR-495-3p promoter was confirmed by a ChIP assay. qRT‒PCR was carried out to detect mRNA levels of miR-495-3p, CREB1 and KPNA2. An EdU assay was conducted to detect cell viability. Transwell assays and flow cytometry were performed to assess cell migration and invasion and apoptosis, respectively. Moreover, factors associated with overall survival were analysed by using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Our results show miR-495-3p to be significantly decreased in melanoma. Additionally, miR-495-3p overexpression inhibited melanoma cell viability. CREB1 targeted miR-495-3p, and CREB1 overexpression enhanced melanoma cell viability by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription. Moreover, miR-495-3p targeted KPNA2, and CREB1 regulated KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to enhance melanoma cell viability.

Conclusion

CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to control melanoma progression. Our results indicate the molecular mechanism by which the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis regulates melanoma progression.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Melanoma is a malignant tumour of the skin, usually rooted deep in the epidermis, and is characterized by the production of melanin [1]. In recent years, the incidence of melanoma has gradually increased, and its metastatic behaviour is considered to be the main cause of death [2]. Therefore, early identification and diagnosis are very important for the treatment of patients with melanoma. Once a tumour metastasizes, the prognosis is very poor [3]. According to the location, stage and genetic characteristics of melanoma, photodynamic therapy, surgical resection and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy are widely used in the treatment of melanoma [4]. However, the 5-year survival rate remains low due to the highly aggressive nature of melanoma. Hence, there is an urgent need to seek new treatments and strategies.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs with a length of approximately 20 bp. MiRNAs inhibit gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by binding to the 3’ untranslated region. An imbalance of miRNAs is related to tumorigenesis, proliferation, metastasis and drug resistance [5]. It has been reported that miR-495-3p dysregulation is closely related to tumour occurrence. Zhao et al. showed that miR-495-3p was down-regulated in osteosarcoma (OS). Overexpression of miR-495-3p inhibits OS metastasis by negatively regulating CTRP3, and miR-495-3p, as a tumour suppressor, is a potential biological target for OS treatment [6]. Li et al. reported that miR-495-3p is expressed at low levels in glioma tissues and cells and is involved in the regulation of glioma angiogenesis [7]. Moreover, Zhang et al. indicated that miR-495-3p is expressed at low levels in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and cell lines and that miR-495-3p overexpression inhibits CRC cell proliferation by targeting HMGB1 [8]. Based on the above findings, miR-495-3p plays a negative role in most tumours and is used as a therapeutic target. However, there are few reports about miR-495-3p in melanoma, and the potential molecular mechanism has not been elucidated.

As a transcription factor involved in metabolism and DNA repair, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein-1 (CREB1) has been proven to play a carcinogenic role in various cancers. In addition, CREB1 can induce transcription of miRNA. Zhao et al. reported that CREB1 induces miR-1204 overexpression and promotes the malignant phenotype of glioblastoma [9]. Li et al. showed that CREB1 activates miR-433 expression and that CREB1/miR-433 plays a key regulatory role in CRC progression [10]. CREB1 modulates cancer progression through transcriptional regulation of microRNA and is a promising molecular target. At the beginning of our study, we detected a binding site for CREB1 in miR-495-3p based on ALGGEN prediction, and we speculated that CREB1 may regulate miR-495-3p expression. However, the specific mechanism of the CREB1/miR-495-3p axis in melanoma progression is unclear.

Karyopherin α2 (KPNA2) is one of the seven members of the nuclide alpha protein family and plays a key role in nucleocytoplasmic transport [11]. KPNA2 may mediate nuclear transport of tumour suppressors, and its up-regulation is closely related to all kinds of malignant tumours. Specifically, KPNA2 promotes tumour formation and progression through cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis [12, 13]. Initially, the binding sequence between miR-495-3p and KPNA2 was predicted through the StarBase website. However, whether miR-495-3p is involved in melanoma progression by targeting KPNA2 remains unclear.

In summary, we hypothesized that the transcription factor CREB1 increases KPNA2 expression by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription, which in turn promotes the development and metastasis of melanoma cells. We aimed to elucidate the underlying mechanism of the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis in melanoma progression. Our research provides a new direction for melanoma treatment.

Materials and methods

Specimens

From January 2021 to February 2022, after receiving written informed consent, 30 patients at Xiangyang First People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College with melanoma and surgical tumour samples and adjacent non-tumour tissues were recruited. The selected patients did not receive chemotherapy /or radiotherapy. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangyang First People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Cell lines and culture

Procell Life Science and Technology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China) provided the HEMa-LP cells and melanoma cell lines, including A375, A2058, B16, and MUM2B cells used in this study. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 1% penicillin‒streptomycin solution (P/S) and 10% FBS (DEME, Gibco, New York). Cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide.

Cell transfection

GeneChem (Shanghai, China) synthesized miR-495-3p mimics and its negative control NC mimics.

The full-length sequences of CREB1 and KPNA2 were obtained by POLYMERase chain reaction and cloned into the eukaryotic expression vector PC DNA3.1 for efficient expression of CREB1 and KPNA2. These plasmids (50 nM) were introduced into A375 and B16 cells using a liposome™3000 transfection agent (Invitrogen, California, USA).

qRT‒PCR

Total RNA of A375 and B16 cells was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Invitrogen) was used to reverse transcribe 1 µg of total RNA to complementary DNA (cDNA) in a final volume of 10 µL. MiRNAs were collected by mirVana microRNA Isolation kits (Invitrogen), and miR-495-3p levels were detected by using the TaqMan microRNA assay kit (Invitrogen). U6 RNA served as an endogenous control. Subsequently, CREB1 and KPNA2 gene levels were quantified by qRT‒PCR. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control for data analysis. The change in mRNA level was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method. The primers used are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Primer sequences
Full size table

EdU assay

A375 and B16 cells were added to a 96-well plate at 5 × 104 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C for 12 h. An EdU staining kit (Guangzhou RiboBio, China) was used for staining. Afterwards, EdU-labelled cells were analysed using a MoFlo Astrios (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

Transwell assay

The migration and invasion abilities of A375 and B16 cells were detected by Transwell assays. Cells (1 × 105/well) were added to the upper cavity of the inlay, and 600 µL culture medium containing 20% foetal bovine serum was added to the lower cavity. After culturing for 30 min, the migration and invasion of the cells stained with crystal violet were observed by microscopy.

Flow cytometry

The apoptosis rate was detected using an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime, Nanjing, China, C1062S) based on previous research [14]. In detail, after exposure of 1.0 × 106 cells to 10 mL binding buffer and 1.25 mL Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate, cells were incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Then, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 ×g for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed; the cells were resuspended in 0.5 mL ice-cold 1× binding buffer. Finally, the cells were incubated with 10 mL propidium iodide and transferred to a fluorescent activated cell sorter tube (Fahrenheit, Munich, Germany). Fluorescence data analysis was performed with WinMDI 2.8 software.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

Potential binding sites for CREB1 in the promoter of miR-495-3p, miR-495-3p and KPNA2 were predicted by using StarBase bioinformatics software. Plasmid construction and luciferase activity assays were performed as previously reported [5].

CHIP assay

Chips were analysed according to the instructions of EZ-Chiptm Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Kit (Sigma‒Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Chromatin fragments of 200 ~ 500 bp were immunoprecipitated with a specific antibody or negative control antibody. DNA released from the protein‒DNA complex was collected and purified with magnetic beads for RT‒qPCR analysis.

Statistical analysis

In this study, a mean ± standard deviation (SD) represents data from three independent trials. The t test was used for comparisons between two groups, and Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used for comparisons between multiple groups. P < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

MiR-495-3p was significantly down-regulated in melanoma

To explore the potential molecular mechanism of miR-495-3p in melanoma, we analysed the level of miR-495-3p in melanoma cells and tissues. Analysis showed that miR-495-3p was decreased in melanoma tissues; miR-495-3p levels correlated negatively with the survival of patients with melanoma (Fig. 1 A and B). Similarly, miR-495-3p was decreased in melanoma cells, especially in A375 and B16 cells (Fig. 1 C). Therefore, A375 and B16 cells were used for subsequent functional studies. qRT‒PCR analysis further showed that miR-495-3p was overexpressed after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with miR-495-3p mimics (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

MiR-495-3p was significantly down-regulated in melanoma. A qRT‒PCR detected miR-495-3p levels in melanoma tissues. B Analysis of the relationship between miR-495-3p level and survival of patients with melanoma. C qRT‒PCR detected miR-495-3p levels in melanoma cells, including A375, A2058, B16, and MUM2B cells. HEMa-LP cells served as the negative control. D qRT‒PCR detected miR-495-3p levels after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with miR-495-3p mimics. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 

Full size image

MiR-495-3p overexpression inhibited melanoma cell viability

To further investigate the underlying molecular mechanism by which miR-495-3p regulates melanoma progression, melanoma cell bioactivities were analysed after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with miR-495-3p mimics. EdU assay analysis indicated significantly decreased viability of miR-495-3p-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells (Fig. 2 A). Consistently, Transwell assay analysis showed that the migration and invasion abilities of miR-495-3p-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells were significantly decreased (Fig. 2B, C). Conversely, miR-495-3p-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells had increased apoptosis rates (Fig. 2D). In summary, miR-495-3p overexpression inhibited melanoma cell viability.

Fig. 2
figure 2

MiR-495-3p overexpression inhibited melanoma cell viability. A EdU assays detected A375 and B16 cell viability. B-C Transwell assays detected A375 and B16 cell migration and invasion. D Flow cytometry detected apoptosis. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (n = 3)

Full size image

CREB1 targeted the promoter of miR-495-3p

First, TransmiR and ALGGEN were used to predict transcription factors regulating miR-495-3p. The results showed binding sites for CREB1 in the promoter sequence of miR-495-3p (Fig. 3 A). Subsequently, dual-luciferase reporter assay analysis revealed that co-transfection of oe-CREB1 inhibited the luciferase activity of the miR-495-3p-WT reporter gene but did not change the luciferase activity of the miR-495-3p-MUT reporter gene (Fig. 3B). The ChIP assay also showed the physical interaction between CREB1 and the promoter of miR-495-3p in melanoma cells (Fig. 3 C). Moreover, qRT‒PCR analysis showed that CREB1 was significantly up-regulated in melanoma tissues and cells, especially in A375 and B16 cells (Fig. 3D and E). Therefore, A375 and B16 cells were used for subsequent functional studies. In addition, CREB1 mRNA levels were significantly up-regulated after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1 (Fig. 3 F). Overall, CREB1 targeted the promoter of miR-495-3p, and CREB1 was up-regulated in melanoma tissues and cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

CREB1 targeted the promoter of miR-495-3p. A TransmiR and ALGGEN were used to predict transcription factors regulating miR-495-3p. B A dual-luciferase reporter assay detected binding of CREB1 to the promoter of miR-495-3p. C Binding between CREB1 and the promoter of miR-495-3p was confirmed by the ChIP assay. D qRT‒PCR detected CREB1 levels in melanoma tissues. E qRT‒PCR detected CREB1 levels in melanoma cells, including A375, A2058, B16, and MUM2B cells. HEMa-LP cells served as the negative control. F qRT‒PCR detected CREB1 levels after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (n = 3)

Full size image

CREB1 overexpression enhanced melanoma cell viability by inhibiting mir-495-3p transcription

To explore whether CREB1 affects melanoma progression by regulating miR-495-3p transcription, melanoma cell bioactivities were analysed after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1. First, qRT‒PCR analysis showed that miR-495-3p was significantly down-regulated after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1 (Fig. 4 A); EdU assay analysis showed that the viability of CREB1-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells was significantly increased (Fig. 4B). Similarly, the abilities of CREB1-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells to migrate and invade were significantly elevated (Fig. 4 C and D). Conversely, flow cytometry analysis indicated that CREB1-overexpressing A375 and B16 cell apoptosis was significantly decreased (Fig. 4E). In conclusion, CREB1 overexpression enhanced melanoma cell viability by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription.

Fig. 4
figure 4

CREB1 overexpression enhanced melanoma cell viability by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription. A qRT‒PCR detected miR-495-3p levels after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1. B EdU assays detected A375 and B16 cell viability. C-D Transwell assays detected A375 and B16 cell migration and invasion. E Flow cytometry detected cell apoptosis. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (n = 3)

Full size image

Mir-495-3p targeted KPNA2

Bioinformatics analysis revealed binding sites in miR-495-3p and KPNA2, which was confirmed by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. In detail, co-transfection of miR-495-3p mimics inhibited the luciferase activity of the CREB1-WT reporter gene but did not change that of the CREB1-MUT reporter gene (Fig. 5 A), indicating that miR-495-3p targeted KPNA2. In contrast, dual-luciferase reporter assay analysis showed no targeting relationship between CREB1 and KPNA2 (Fig. 5B). Subsequently, KPNA2 expression was significantly decreased in melanoma tissues and cells, especially in A375 and B16 cells (Fig. 5 C and D). Furthermore, CREB1 overexpression promoted KPNA2 expression, but the upward trend was reversed by miR-495-3p overexpression (Fig. 5E). Therefore, we believe that miR-495-3p targets KPNA2.

Fig. 5
figure 5

miR-495-3p targeted KPNA2. A Bioinformatics analysis predicted the relationship between miR-495-3p and KPNA2, and a dual-luciferase reporter assay detected binding between miR-495-3p and KPNA2. B A dual-luciferase reporter assay detected binding of CREB1 to KPNA2. C qRT‒PCR detected KPNA2 levels in melanoma tissues. D qRT‒PCR detected KPNA2 levels in melanoma cells, including A375, A2058, B16, and MUM2B cells. HEMa-LP cells served as the negative control. E qRT‒PCR detected KPNA2 levels after A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-CREB1 and miR-495-3p mimics. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (n = 3)

Full size image

CREB1 regulated KPNA2 by inhibiting mir-495-3p transcription to enhance melanoma cell viability

MiR-495-3p and KPNA2 mRNA levels were detected after CREB1-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells were transfected with miR-495-3p mimics or miR-495-3p-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-KPNA2. The results showed an increase in miR-495-3p mRNA by miR-495-3p overexpression, whereas KPNA2 overexpression had no effect on miR-495-3p expression. Conversely, KPNA2 mRNA levels were down-regulated by miR-495-3p overexpression, though the impact of miR-495-3p overexpression was subsequently recovered by KPNA2 overexpression (Fig. 6 A). Next, EdU assay analysis showed that the CREB1 overexpression-induced increase in A375 and B16 cell viability was inhibited by miR-495-3p overexpression and that the impact of miR-459-3p overexpression was subsequently recovered by KPNA2 overexpression (Fig. 6B). Similar results were observed for A375 and B16 cell migration and invasion (Fig. 6 C and D). According to flow cytometry analysis, the CREB1 overexpression-decreased apoptosis in A375 and B16 cells was rescued by miR-495-3p overexpression, but KPNA2 overexpression antagonized the effect of miR-495-3p overexpression (Fig. 6E). Therefore, we conclude that CREB1 regulated KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to enhance melanoma cell viability.

Fig. 6
figure 6

CREB1 regulated KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to enhance melanoma cell viability. A miR-495-3p and KPNA2 mRNA levels were detected after CREB1-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells were transfected with miR-495-3p mimics or miR-495-3p-overexpressing A375 and B16 cells were transfected with oe-KPNA2. B EdU assays detected A375 and B16 cell viability. C-D Transwell assays detected A375 and B16 cell migration and invasion. E Flow cytometry detected apoptosis. The mean ± standard deviation represents data from three independent trials (n = 3). *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (n = 3)

Full size image

Discussion

The incidence of melanoma is increasing yearly. Elucidating the pathogenesis of melanoma is beneficial for finding new treatment methods [15, 16]. We mainly clarify the role of the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis in melanoma. Our findings illustrate that CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to control melanoma progression. Our study demonstrates for the first time that CREB1 participates in the regulation of melanoma progression through the miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis.

MiR-495-3p is a key regulator of tumorigenesis and malignant progression. It has been reported that miR-495-3p is up-regulated in various tumour tissues, including melanoma [17]. Our findings reveal that miR-495-3p was significantly down-regulated in melanoma and that miR-495-3p overexpression inhibited melanoma cell viability. These findings suggest that miR-495-3p acts as a tumour suppressor involved in the negative regulation of melanoma progression. MiRNAs can be transcriptionally activated by certain transcription factors [18]. CREB1 has been shown to be involved in the regulation of various malignant tumours, including melanoma. The specific mechanism may be CREB1 transcriptional regulation of miRNAs, thus promoting tumour development. Liu et al. showed that CREB1 promotes the malignant behaviour of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via transcriptional regulation of miR-922 [19]. Yan et al. reported that CREB1 induces miR-489 to promote CRC progression [20]. Our findings show that CREB1 targets the promoter of miR-495-3p. Moreover, CREB1 was down-regulated in melanoma tissues and cell lines, and CREB1 overexpression enhanced melanoma cell viability by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription. These findings suggest that as a carcinogen involved in regulating melanin progression, CREB1 may serve as a therapeutic target for melanoma. Our study is the first to demonstrate that CREB1 is involved in the regulation of melanoma progression through transcriptional control of miR-495-3p. Increasing evidence shows that miRNAs regulate target genes involved in tumorigenesis and melanoma development. MiR-200a has been proven to inhibit CDK6 expression in metastatic melanoma cells, which is an important factor promoting tumour development [21]. Guo et al. reported that miR-18a-5p induces proliferation and inhibited apoptosis of melanoma cells by targeting EPHA7 [22]. Fen et al. showed that miR-548b inhibits the growth and metastasis of melanoma by negatively regulating HMGB1 [23]. Our results indicate that miR-495-3p targets KPNA2 in melanoma. KPNA2 is a kind of connexin that is a member of the α protein family of beneficial nuclear proteins and plays a key role in the process of nucleocytoplasmic transport [24]. Studies have shown that KPNA2 is a potential biomarker for a variety of cancers [25, 26]. Our findings show that KPNA2 is highly expressed in melanoma tissues and cell lines and that CREB1 overexpression promotes KPNA2 expression. Based on the above results, we believe that CREB1 promotes KPNA2 expression in melanoma cells by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription. Moreover, functional experiments further showed that CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to enhance melanoma cell viability.

In summary, our research illustrates that CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting miR-495-3p transcription to regulate melanoma progression. Our findings highlight the specific molecular mechanism by which the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis regulates melanoma progression. This study on the function of the CREB1/miR-495-3p/KPNA2 axis in the development and metastasis of melanoma provides new insight into the pathogenesis of melanoma and a promising method for the treatment of melanoma.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the corresponding author(E-mail:liuchunlei5751@126.com), without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

References

  1. Mkhobongo B, Chandran R, Abrahamse H. The Role of Melanoma Cell-Derived Exosomes (MTEX) and Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) within a Tumor Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):9726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Domingues B, et al. Melanoma treatment in review. ImmunoTargets and therapy. 2018;7:35–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dummer R, et al. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v126-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Batus M, et al. Optimal management of metastatic melanoma: current strategies and future directions. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013;14(3):179–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang J, et al. MiR-495-3p and miR-143-3p co-target CDK1 to inhibit the development of cervical cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(11):2323–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao G, et al. miR-495-3p inhibits the cell proliferation, invasion and migration of osteosarcoma by targeting C1q/TNF-related protein 3. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:6133–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li H, et al. SUMOylation of IGF2BP2 promotes vasculogenic mimicry of glioma via regulating OIP5-AS1/miR-495-3p axis. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(11):2912–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang JL, et al. miR-495-3p depresses cell proliferation and migration by downregulating HMGB1 in colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao X, et al. CREB1-induced miR-1204 promoted malignant phenotype of glioblastoma through targeting NR3C2. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan L, et al. A CREB1/miR-433 reciprocal feedback loop modulates proliferation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Aging. 2018;10(12):3774–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leung SW, et al. Dissection of the karyopherin alpha nuclear localization signal (NLS)-binding groove: functional requirements for NLS binding. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(43):41947–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alshareeda AT, et al. KPNA2 is a nuclear export protein that contributes to aberrant localisation of key proteins and poor prognosis of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(12):1929–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, et al. Karyopherin alpha 2 is a novel prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target for colon cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Banesh S, Trivedi V. CD36 Ectodomain Detects Apoptosis in Mammalian Cells. Mol Biotechnol. 2021;63(11):992–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis LE, Shalin SC, Tackett AJ. Current state of melanoma diagnosis and treatment. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(11):1366–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sood S, Jayachandiran R, Pandey S. Current Advancements and Novel Strategies in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma. Integr Cancer Ther. 2021;20:1534735421990078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan BX, Geng XR, Wu YQ. lncRNA RNCR2 facilitates cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in melanoma through HK2-mediated Warburg effect via targeting miR-495-3p. Neoplasma. 2021;68(4):692–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo W, et al. The vitamin D receptor regulates miR-140-5p and targets the MAPK pathway in bone development. Metabolism. 2018;85:139–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, et al. CREB1 acts via the miR–922/ARID2 axis to enhance malignant behavior of liver cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2021;45(5):79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng Y, et al. CREB1-induced lncRNA LEF1-AS1 contributes to colorectal cancer progression via the miR-489/DIAPH1 axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;526(3):678–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bustos MA, et al. MiR-200a Regulates CDK4/6 Inhibitor Effect by Targeting CDK6 in Metastatic Melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(9):1955–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo Y, Shi W, Fang R. miR–18a–5p promotes melanoma cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis and autophagy by targeting EPHA7 signaling. Mol Med Rep. 2021;23(1):79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng XE. miR-548b Suppresses Melanoma Cell Growth, Migration, and Invasion by Negatively Regulating Its Target Gene HMGB1. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36(2):189–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lange A, et al. Classical nuclear localization signals: definition, function, and interaction with importin alpha. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(8):5101–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Christiansen A, Dyrskjøt L. The functional role of the novel biomarker karyopherin α 2 (KPNA2) in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013;331(1):18–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Altan B, et al. Nuclear karyopherin-α2 expression in primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes was associated with poor prognosis and progression in gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(10):2314–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xuerui Geng and Xiujuan Qiu contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xiangyang No 1 People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine, No.15 Jiefang Road, Fancheng district, Hubei Province, 441000, Xiangyang City, China

    Xuerui Geng, Xiujuan Qiu, Jun Gao, Zhifan Gong, Xiaogang Zhou, Chunlei Liu & Haichao Luo

Authors
  1. Xuerui Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiujuan Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhifan Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaogang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chunlei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haichao Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xuerui Geng:Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Xiujuan Qiu:Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Jun Gao: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft& Editing, Supervision. Zhifan Gong: Investigation, Supervision, Writing. Xiaogang Zhou: Investigation, Supervision, Writing. Chunlei Liu: Investigation, Supervision, Writing. Haichao Luo: Investigation, Supervision, Writing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunlei Liu or Haichao Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Xiangyang No 1 People's Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine. All authors confirm that all methods are carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The author confirms that he has obtained confirmed informed consent from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geng, X., Qiu, X., Gao, J. et al. CREB1 regulates KPNA2 by inhibiting mir-495-3p transcription to control melanoma progression. BMC Mol and Cell Biol 23, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-022-00446-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-022-00446-1

Keywords

BMC Molecular and Cell Biology

ISSN: 2661-8850

Contact us